Suppr超能文献

使用51Cr-乙二胺四乙酸(51Cr-EDTA)对肾小球滤过率(GFR)进行的传统测量会使真实的肾脏清除率高估10%。

Conventional measurements of GFR using 51Cr-EDTA overestimate true renal clearance by 10 percent.

作者信息

Moore Amelia E B, Park-Holohan So-Jin, Blake Glen M, Fogelman Ignac

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, St Thomas Street, London, SE1 9RT, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Jan;30(1):4-8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-1007-y. Epub 2002 Oct 26.

Abstract

It is widely believed that measurement of the area under the plasma clearance curve (AUC) following a single intravenous injection of chromium-51 labelled ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid ((51)Cr-EDTA) is a gold standard method for determining glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, there are reports that (51)Cr-EDTA may have a significant extrarenal clearance. The aim of this study was to identify the non-renal component of (51)Cr-EDTA plasma clearance contributing to the AUC measurement of GFR. Seventy healthy postmenopausal women (mean age 60 years, range 45-79 years) were injected with 3 MBq (51)Cr-EDTA and 0.25 MBq iodine-125 labelled human serum albumin and 11 blood samples taken between 0 and 4 h through an indwelling venous cannula. For the first 21 subjects, two complete urine collections were made 0-2 h and 2-4 h after injection, and for the final 49 patients, four 1-h urine collections were made. The mean (51)Cr-EDTA total plasma clearance was 84 ml/min (range 50-132 ml/min). The mean ratio (SEM) of urine to total clearance determined from the cumulative 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-h data was 0.903 (0.018), 0.891 (0.013), 0.898 (0.011) and 0.899 (0.010) respectively and remained constant despite the mean urine concentration decreasing from 122% to 15%/litre during this period. A least squares fit to data from the 238 individual urine collections was used to determine the fraction of the total plasma clearance attributable to renal clearance, alpha(0), and the residual urine volume, delta V. The results were alpha(0)=0.910 (95% CI: 0.889-0.932) and delta V=14 ml (95% CI: -4 to +34 ml). The overestimation of the true renal clearance of (51)Cr-EDTA by the AUC method is believed to be due to the failure of the plasma clearance curve to reach the true terminal exponential by 2 h after injection as usually assumed. As a result, conventional measurements of GFR using (51)Cr-EDTA overestimate the true renal clearance of tracer by approximately 10%.

摘要

人们普遍认为,单次静脉注射铬-51标记的乙二胺四乙酸((51)Cr-EDTA)后测量血浆清除曲线下面积(AUC)是测定肾小球滤过率(GFR)的金标准方法。然而,有报道称(51)Cr-EDTA可能有显著的肾外清除。本研究的目的是确定对GFR的AUC测量有贡献的(51)Cr-EDTA血浆清除的非肾成分。70名健康绝经后女性(平均年龄60岁,范围45 - 79岁)静脉注射3 MBq (51)Cr-EDTA和0.25 MBq碘-125标记的人血清白蛋白,并通过留置静脉套管在0至4小时内采集11份血样。对于前21名受试者,在注射后0 - 2小时和2 - 4小时进行两次完整的尿液收集,对于最后49名患者,进行四次1小时的尿液收集。(51)Cr-EDTA的平均总血浆清除率为84 ml/分钟(范围50 - 132 ml/分钟)。根据累积的1小时、2小时、3小时和4小时数据确定的尿液与总清除率的平均比值(SEM)分别为0.903(0.018)、0.891(0.013)、0.898(0.011)和0.899(0.010),尽管在此期间平均尿浓度从122%降至15%/升,但该比值保持恒定。使用对238次个体尿液收集数据的最小二乘法拟合来确定可归因于肾清除的总血浆清除率分数α(0)和残余尿量δV。结果为α(0)=0.910(95%可信区间:0.889 - 0.932)和δV = 14 ml(95%可信区间:-4至 +34 ml)。据信,AUC方法对(51)Cr-EDTA真实肾清除率的高估是由于血浆清除曲线在注射后2小时未能如通常假设那样达到真实的终末指数。因此,使用(51)Cr-EDTA对GFR进行的传统测量会使示踪剂的真实肾清除率高估约10%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验