Suppr超能文献

腹水肝硬化患者 24 小时血浆清除率的 Tikhonov 自适应正则化伽马变量拟合验证。

Validation of Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting with 24-h plasma clearance in cirrhotic patients with ascites.

机构信息

Radiology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Dec;38(12):2247-56. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1887-9. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim was to compare late-time extrapolation of plasma clearance (CL) from Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting (Tk-GV) and from mono-exponential (E1) fitting.

METHODS

Ten (51)Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid bolus IV studies in adults--8 with ascites--assessed for liver transplantation, with 12-16 plasma samples drawn from 5-min to 24-h, were fit with Tk-GV and E1 models and CL results were compared using Passing-Bablok fitting.

RESULTS

The 24-h CL(Tk-GV) values ranged from 11.4 to 79.7 ml/min. Linear regression of 4- versus 24-h CL(Tk-GV) yielded no significant departure from a slope of 1, whereas the 4- versus 24-h CL(E1) slope, 1.56, was significantly increased. For CL(Tk-GV-24-h) versus CL(E1-24-h), there was a biased slope and intercept (0.85, 5.97 ml/min). Moreover, the quality of fitting of 24-h data was significantly better for Tk-GV than for E1, as follows. For 10 logarithm of concentration curves, higher r values were obtained for each Tk-GV fit (median 0.998) than for its corresponding E1 fit (median 0.965), with p < 0.0001 (paired t-test of z-statistics from Fisher r-z transformations). The E1 fit quality degraded with increasing V/W [volume of distribution (l) per kg body weight, p = 0.003]. However, Tk-GV fit quality versus V/W was uncorrelated (p = 0.8).

CONCLUSION

CL(E1) values were dependent on sample time and the quality of fit was poor and degraded with increasing ascites, consistent with current opinion that CL(E1) is contraindicated in ascitic patients. CL(Tk-GV) was relatively more accurate and the good quality of fit was unaffected by ascites. CL(Tk-GV) was the preferred method for the accurate calculation of CL and was useful despite liver failure and ascites.

摘要

目的

旨在比较 Tikhonov 自适应正则化伽马变量拟合(Tk-GV)和单指数(E1)拟合从晚期时间外推血浆清除率(CL)。

方法

对 10 例(51 例)成人(51 例)进行(51 例)51Cr-乙二胺四乙酸静脉推注 IV 研究-有腹水的 8 例)进行肝移植评估,从 5 分钟到 24 小时抽取 12-16 个血浆样本,用 Tk-GV 和 E1 模型拟合,并使用 Passing-Bablok 拟合比较 CL 结果。

结果

24 小时 CL(Tk-GV)值范围为 11.4 至 79.7 ml/min。4 小时与 24 小时 CL(Tk-GV)的线性回归没有明显偏离斜率 1,而 4 小时与 24 小时 CL(E1)的斜率为 1.56,明显增加。对于 CL(Tk-GV-24-h)与 CL(E1-24-h),斜率和截距存在偏差(0.85、5.97 ml/min)。此外,Tk-GV 对 24 小时数据的拟合质量明显优于 E1,如下所示。对于 10 个对数浓度曲线,每个 Tk-GV 拟合的 r 值(中位数 0.998)均高于其相应的 E1 拟合(中位数 0.965),p<0.0001(配对 t 检验 Fisher r-z 转换的 z 统计量)。E1 拟合质量随 V/W [体重(kg)的分布体积,p=0.003]增加而降低。然而,Tk-GV 拟合质量与 V/W 无关(p=0.8)。

结论

CL(E1)值取决于样本时间,拟合质量差,随着腹水的增加而恶化,这与目前认为 CL(E1)在腹水患者中禁忌的观点一致。CL(Tk-GV)相对更准确,良好的拟合质量不受腹水影响。CL(Tk-GV)是准确计算 CL 的首选方法,即使在肝功能衰竭和腹水的情况下也很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e77/3218286/b31502ffbfd0/259_2011_1887_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验