Hanley Nick, Ryan Mandy, Wright Robert
Economics Department, University of Glasgow, UK.
Health Econ. 2003 Jan;12(1):3-16. doi: 10.1002/hec.763.
In the recent past, considerable effort in health economics has been made on applying stated preference methods such as contingent valuation and choice experiments. Despite this increased use, there is still considerable scepticism concerning the value of these approaches. The application of contingent valuation in environmental economics has a long history and has been widely accepted. Whilst choice experiments were introduced to the environmental and health economics literature at a similar time, the wider acceptance of monetary measures of benefit in environmental economics has meant that they have also been more widely applied. The purpose of this paper is to identify some of the key issues and debates that have taken place in the environmental economics literature, summarise the state of the art with respect to these issues, and consider how health economists have addressed these issues. Important areas for future research in health economics are identified.
最近,健康经济学领域在应用诸如条件价值评估法和选择实验等陈述偏好方法方面付出了巨大努力。尽管这些方法的使用有所增加,但人们对其价值仍存在相当大的怀疑。条件价值评估法在环境经济学中的应用历史悠久且已被广泛接受。虽然选择实验是在同一时期被引入环境和健康经济学文献的,但环境经济学中对效益货币衡量方法的更广泛接受意味着它们也得到了更广泛的应用。本文的目的是识别环境经济学文献中出现的一些关键问题和争论,总结这些问题的当前状况,并思考健康经济学家是如何解决这些问题的。同时确定了健康经济学未来研究的重要领域。