Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Division of Health Technology Assessment, ONCOTYROL, Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Dec;23(9):1455-1482. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01437-x. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
Stated preference studies are a valuable tool to elicit respondents' willingness to pay (WTP) for goods or services, especially in situations where no market valuation exists. Contingent valuation (CV) is a widely used approach among stated-preference techniques for eliciting WTP if prices do not exist or do not reflect actual costs, for example, when services are covered by insurance. This review aimed to provide an overview of relevant factors determining WTP for health services to support variable selection.
A comprehensive systematic literature search and review of CV studies assessing determinants of WTP for health services was conducted, including 11 electronic databases. Two of the authors made independent decisions on the eligibility of studies. We extracted all determinants used and related p values for the effect sizes (e.g. reported in regression models with WTP for a health service as outcome variable). Determinants were summarised in systematic evidence tables and structured by thematic domains.
We identified 2082 publications, of which 202 full texts were checked for eligibility. We included 62 publications on 61 studies in the review. Across all studies, we identified 22 WTP determinants and other factors from 5 thematic domains: sociodemographic characteristics, perceived threat, perceived benefit, perceived barriers, and other information.
Our review provides evidence on 22 relevant determinants of WTP for health services, which may be used for variable selection and as guidance for planning CV surveys. Endogeneity should be carefully considered before interpreting these determinants as causal factors and potential intervention targets.
意愿调查评估法是一种有价值的工具,可以用来衡量人们对商品或服务的支付意愿(WTP),尤其是在没有市场价值的情况下。在没有价格或价格不能反映实际成本的情况下,条件价值评估(CV)是一种广泛应用于意愿调查评估法的方法,例如当服务由保险覆盖时。本综述旨在提供有关健康服务支付意愿决定因素的概述,以支持变量选择。
我们进行了全面的系统文献检索和 CV 研究综述,评估了健康服务支付意愿的决定因素,包括 11 个电子数据库。两位作者独立决定研究的资格。我们提取了所有使用的决定因素及其与效果大小的相关 p 值(例如,以健康服务的支付意愿为因变量的回归模型中报告)。决定因素在系统证据表中进行了总结,并按主题领域进行了结构化。
我们确定了 2082 篇出版物,其中 202 篇全文检查了资格。我们综述中包括了 62 篇出版物和 61 项研究。在所有研究中,我们从 5 个主题领域确定了 22 个支付意愿决定因素和其他因素:社会人口特征、感知威胁、感知收益、感知障碍和其他信息。
我们的综述提供了有关健康服务支付意愿的 22 个相关决定因素的证据,这些决定因素可用于变量选择,并为 CV 调查规划提供指导。在将这些决定因素解释为因果因素和潜在干预目标之前,应仔细考虑内源性。