Wickramasekera Nyantara, Palfreyman Simon, Lumley Elizabeth, Dosanjh Arvind, Shackley Phil
School of Health and Related Research University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
Faculty of Nursing University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 28;5(4):e715. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.715. eCollection 2022 Jul.
There is widespread variation in venous leg ulcer (VLU) wound care contributing to inadequate service provision resulting in poor outcomes to patients. Little has been published on the perspectives of where treatments should be carried out. The aim of the study was to quantify respondents' preferences for the preferred place of treatment for VLU.
A UK general population sample was interviewed to elicit preferences for clinic or home care treatment using the willingness to pay elicitation method. Participants were presented with two vignettes describing clinic or home care of VLU, and were asked to select the treatment process that they preferred and provide a detailed explanation for selecting that choice. Then they were asked to state their maximum hypothetical amounts that they were willing to pay for the treatment processes.
One hundred fifty-four participants completed the interviews. Respondents were willing to pay £498.96 to receive VLU treatment at a clinic and £505.60 to receive care at home. This difference between the clinic compared to home care was not statistically significant. Advantages of clinic care include being able to book an appointment allowing participants to plan events around the booking and for home care the convenience for those with impaired mobility who may have difficulty traveling.
The results show that respondents placed an equal valuation on the place of treatment suggesting no strong preference for either home or clinic care. However, qualitative findings emphasized that impaired mobility may be a barrier to accessing VLU services for some therefore, individuals should be given the choice to select their preferred setting to receive treatment where possible.
下肢静脉溃疡(VLU)伤口护理存在广泛差异,导致服务提供不足,给患者带来不良后果。关于治疗地点的观点发表较少。本研究的目的是量化受访者对VLU首选治疗地点的偏好。
采用支付意愿诱导法对英国普通人群样本进行访谈,以了解其对诊所治疗或家庭护理的偏好。向参与者展示两个描述VLU诊所护理或家庭护理的 vignette,并要求他们选择自己喜欢的治疗方式,并详细解释选择该方式的原因。然后要求他们说出愿意为治疗方式支付的最大假设金额。
154名参与者完成了访谈。受访者愿意支付498.96英镑在诊所接受VLU治疗,愿意支付505.60英镑接受家庭护理。诊所护理与家庭护理之间的这种差异无统计学意义。诊所护理的优点包括能够预约,使参与者能够围绕预约安排活动;对于家庭护理来说,对行动不便、出行可能有困难的人很方便。
结果表明,受访者对治疗地点的评价相同,表明对家庭护理或诊所护理没有强烈偏好。然而,定性研究结果强调,行动不便可能是一些人获得VLU服务的障碍,因此,应尽可能让个人选择他们喜欢的治疗环境。