Apple Fred S, Wu Alan H B, Jaffe Allan S
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minn, USA.
Am Heart J. 2002 Dec;144(6):981-6. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.124048.
The European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology guidelines for redefinition of myocardial infarction suggest that the cutoff value for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) be the 99th percentile of the reference population at a level measured with imprecision (coefficient of variation) > or =10%. No current commercially available troponin assay meets this requirement. Accordingly, questions have been raised about how to implement cutoff values from the guidelines. The Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive druG Evaluation (COURAGE) trial asked for recommendations concerning the use of troponin assays for the trial.
Cutoff values for the various assays were obtained from package inserts or from direct communication with manufacturers.
The cutoff value with > or =10% imprecision was above the 99th percentile of the reference range for all assays. For the present, we suggest that this value be used for clinical and clinical trial purposes. It will account for analytic variability and individual biological changes. We provide recommendations for clinical practice and clinical trials concerning how to make the diagnosis of AMI in patients with ischemic symptoms and patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery.
This is a first attempt to define cutoff values on the basis of the European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology guidelines. These criteria will provide increased consistency until assays improve to allow full implementation of the guidelines.
欧洲心脏病学会和美国心脏病学会关于心肌梗死重新定义的指南建议,急性心肌梗死(AMI)诊断的临界值应为参考人群第99百分位数,且测量不精密度(变异系数)≥10%。目前尚无市售肌钙蛋白检测方法满足这一要求。因此,对于如何应用指南中的临界值引发了诸多问题。“利用血运重建和积极药物评估的临床结果(COURAGE)”试验就该试验中肌钙蛋白检测方法的使用征求了建议。
各种检测方法的临界值从产品说明书或与制造商直接沟通获取。
不精密度≥10%的临界值高于所有检测方法参考范围的第99百分位数。目前,我们建议将该值用于临床和临床试验目的。它将考虑分析变异性和个体生物学变化。我们针对有缺血症状的患者以及接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者,就如何诊断AMI提供了临床实践和临床试验方面的建议。
这是首次尝试根据欧洲心脏病学会和美国心脏病学会的指南来定义临界值。在检测方法改进以全面实施指南之前,这些标准将提高诊断的一致性。