Suppr超能文献

可预防的麻醉事故:人为因素研究。1978年。

Preventable anesthesia mishaps: a study of human factors. 1978.

作者信息

Cooper Jeffrey B, Newbower Ronald S, Long Charlene D, McPeek Bucknam

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep;11(3):277-82. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.277.

Abstract

A modified critical-incident analysis technique was used in a retrospective examination of the characteristics of human error and equipment failure in anesthetic practice. The objective was to uncover patterns of frequently occurring incidents that are in need of careful prospective investigation. Forty seven interviews were conducted with staff and resident anesthesiologists at one urban teaching institution, and descriptions of 359 preventable incidents were obtained. Twenty three categories of details from these descriptions were subjected to computer-aided analysis for trends and patterns. Most of the preventable incidents involved human error (82%), with breathing-circuit disconnections, inadvertent changes in gas flow, and drug syringe errors being frequent problems. Overt equipment failures constituted only 14% of the total number of preventable incidents, but equipment design was indictable in many categories of human error, as were inadequate experience and insufficient familiarity with equipment or with the specific surgical procedure. Other factors frequently associated with incidents were inadequate communication among personnel, haste or lack of precaution, and distraction. Results from multi-hospital studies based on the methodology developed could be used for more objective determination of priorities and planning of specific investments for decreasing the risk associated with anesthesia.

摘要

一种改良的关键事件分析技术被用于回顾性研究麻醉实践中的人为失误和设备故障特征。目的是发现那些需要进行仔细前瞻性调查的频繁发生事件的模式。在一所城市教学机构对工作人员和住院麻醉医师进行了47次访谈,获得了359起可预防事件的描述。对这些描述中的23类细节进行了计算机辅助分析,以寻找趋势和模式。大多数可预防事件涉及人为失误(82%),呼吸回路断开、气体流量意外改变和药物注射器错误是常见问题。明显的设备故障仅占可预防事件总数的14%,但在许多人为失误类别中,设备设计应受到指责,经验不足以及对设备或特定手术操作不够熟悉也应受到指责。与事件频繁相关的其他因素包括人员之间沟通不足、匆忙或缺乏预防措施以及注意力分散。基于所开发方法的多医院研究结果可用于更客观地确定优先级以及规划具体投资,以降低与麻醉相关的风险。

相似文献

6
Observation method of detecting medication errors.检测用药错误的观察方法。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Dec 1;59(23):2314-6. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/59.23.2314.
7
Incident reporting at the local and national level.地方和国家层面的事件报告。
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2014 Winter;52(1):69-83. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000008.
9
Anaesthetic risk.
Med Leg J. 1998;66 ( Pt 2):49-59. doi: 10.1177/002581729806600202.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Usability Test Procedure Generation for Medical Devices.医疗设备的最佳可用性测试程序生成
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;11(3):296. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030296.
6
Root Cause Analysis of Blunders in Anesthesia.麻醉失误的根本原因分析
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;13(2):193-198. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_47_19.

本文引用的文献

1
A critical incident study of hospital medication errors.
Hospitals. 1960 May 1;34:32-4; passim.
2
DEATHS ASSOCIATED WITH ANAESTHESIA.与麻醉相关的死亡
Br J Anaesth. 1963 Apr;35:250-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/35.4.250.
3
VIGILANCE: A REVIEW AND RE-EVALUATION.警惕性:综述与重新评估
Hum Factors. 1963 Jun;5:211-38. doi: 10.1177/001872086300500305.
4
Psychological bulletin.《心理通报》
Psychol Bull. 1962 Jul;59:257-72.
5
The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality.麻醉在手术死亡率中的作用。
JAMA. 1961 Oct 21;178:261-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.1961.03040420001001.
6
Deaths associated with anaesthesia; a report on 1,000 cases.与麻醉相关的死亡;1000例报告。
Anaesthesia. 1956 Jul;11(3):194-220. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1956.tb07975.x.
7
The critical incident technique.关键事件技术。
Psychol Bull. 1954 Jul;51(4):327-58. doi: 10.1037/h0061470.
9
Equipment design and "human" limitations.设备设计与“人为”限制。
Anesthesiology. 1971 Jul;35(1):101-2. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197107000-00032.
10
Anesthesia mortality.麻醉死亡率。
Clin Anesth. 1974;10(3):220-44.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验