Hore Craig T
School of Rural Health (Mid North Coast), Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2002 Sep;14(3):281-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2002.00346.x.
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation is an emerging modality in contemporary critical care practice. Perhaps the most widely utilized and familiar form of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation is mask continuous positive airway pressure. Other common modes include mask Bi-level positive airway pressure and mask pressure support ventilation. All feature the delivery of positive airway pressure via a mask (full-face, naso-oral or nasal), and a patient-controlled respiratory cycle. The physiological benefits of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation suggested by a number of studies include improved oxygenation, decreased work of breathing, improved ventilation and perfusion matching, decreased fatigue, and increased minute ventilation. The utilization of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation has now been reported for a variety of clinical indications. In most, randomized trials are lacking, and the benefits and preferred mode of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation are still to be elucidated. In general, in patients that are candidates for endotracheal intubation, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation should be used as a way to possibly avoid endotracheal intubation rather than as an alternative to endotracheal intubation. Whilst the benefit of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation appears to be established in patients with chronic obstructive airways disease with hypercapnic acute respiratory failure, one of the major unresolved issues is whether one modality is significantly better than the others. Unfortunately, the question of whether Bi-level positive airway pressure is better than continuous positive airway pressure in this clinical scenario has not been satisfactorily addressed in any large randomized and controlled clinical trial. Further, there is no 'gold standard' for predicting success with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, although several studies have looked at this aspect.
无创正压通气是当代重症监护实践中一种新兴的治疗方式。也许最广泛应用且为人熟知的无创正压通气形式是面罩持续气道正压通气。其他常见模式包括面罩双水平气道正压通气和面罩压力支持通气。所有这些模式的特点都是通过面罩(全面罩、口鼻面罩或鼻面罩)输送气道正压,并由患者控制呼吸周期。多项研究表明,无创正压通气的生理益处包括改善氧合、减少呼吸功、改善通气与灌注匹配、减轻疲劳以及增加分钟通气量。目前已有关于无创正压通气用于多种临床适应证的报道。在大多数情况下,缺乏随机试验,无创正压通气的益处和首选模式仍有待阐明。一般来说,对于有气管插管指征的患者,无创正压通气应作为一种可能避免气管插管的方法,而不是作为气管插管的替代方法。虽然无创正压通气在慢性阻塞性气道疾病合并高碳酸血症急性呼吸衰竭患者中的益处似乎已得到证实,但一个主要的未解决问题是一种模式是否明显优于其他模式。不幸的是,在任何大型随机对照临床试验中,都没有令人满意地解决在这种临床情况下双水平气道正压通气是否优于持续气道正压通气的问题。此外,虽然有几项研究关注了这方面,但目前尚无预测无创正压通气成功的“金标准”。