• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

十年的药物治疗法庭研究。

A decade of drug treatment court research.

作者信息

Turner Susan, Longshore Douglas, Wenzel Suzanne, Deschenes Elizabeth, Greenwood Peter, Fain Terry, Harrell Adele, Morral Andrew, Taxman Faye, Iguchi Martin, Greene Judith, McBride Duane

机构信息

RAND, Santa Monica, California 90407-213, USA.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1489-527. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014420.

DOI:10.1081/ja-120014420
PMID:12487232
Abstract

As drug treatment courts have multiplied over the past decade, so too have research evaluations conducted on their implementation and effectiveness. This article explores the decade of drug treatment court research conducted at RAND, starting with the experimental field evaluation of Maricopa's drug testing and treatment options to the most current 14-site national evaluation of courts funded in 1995-96 by the Drug Court Program Office. The article presents summaries of findings, a brief description of a drug treatment court typology, and suggestion of where future research might focus.

摘要

在过去十年中,药物治疗法庭的数量不断增加,对其实施情况和效果进行的研究评估也日益增多。本文探讨了兰德公司开展的为期十年的药物治疗法庭研究,从对马里科帕县药物检测和治疗方案的实验性实地评估,到药物法庭项目办公室于1995 - 1996年资助的最新的14个地点的全国性法庭评估。文章介绍了研究结果总结、药物治疗法庭类型的简要描述,以及对未来研究可能重点关注领域的建议。

相似文献

1
A decade of drug treatment court research.十年的药物治疗法庭研究。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1489-527. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014420.
2
Juvenile drug treatment courts in the United States: initial lessons learned and issues being addressed.美国青少年毒品治疗法庭:初步经验教训及正在解决的问题。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1689-722. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014427.
3
The challenges of conducting research in drug treatment court settings.在药物治疗法庭环境中开展研究的挑战。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1635-64. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014425.
4
Drug treatment courts, British style: the drug treatment court movement in Britain.英式毒品治疗法庭:英国的毒品治疗法庭运动
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1595-614. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014423.
5
Drug treatment courts--a viable option for Canada? Sentencing issues and preliminary findings from the Toronto court.毒品治疗法庭——加拿大的一个可行选择?量刑问题及多伦多法庭的初步调查结果。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1529-66. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014421.
6
Drug treatment courts and the disease paradigm.药物治疗法庭与疾病范式。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1723-50. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014428.
7
Treatment inside the drug treatment court: the who, what, where, and how of treatment services.药物治疗法庭内的治疗:治疗服务的对象、内容、地点及方式。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1665-88. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014426.
8
A dozen years of drug treatment courts: uncovering our theoretical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm.十二年的药物治疗法庭:揭示我们的理论基础与主流范式的构建
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1469-88. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014419.
9
The emergence of drug treatment courts in Australia.澳大利亚毒品治疗法庭的出现。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1567-94. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014422.
10
Factors associated with completion of a drug treatment court diversion program.与药物治疗法庭分流计划完成情况相关的因素。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1615-33. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014424.

引用本文的文献

1
A debate on whether drug courts be opened in India: Considerations and pragmatic suggestions.关于是否在印度开设毒品法庭的辩论:考量与务实建议。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;66(11):1059-1065. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_568_24. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
2
Environmental Enrichment Modulates Drug Addiction and Binge-Like Consumption of Highly Rewarding Substances: A Role for Anxiety and Compulsivity Brain Systems?环境富集调节药物成瘾和高奖赏性物质的暴饮暴食:焦虑和强迫性脑系统的作用?
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Nov 29;12:295. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00295. eCollection 2018.
3
Decomposing Racial Disparities in Prison and Drug Treatment Commitments for Criminal Offenders in California.
剖析加利福尼亚州罪犯入狱及戒毒治疗承诺方面的种族差异
J Legal Stud. 2014 Jan 1;43(1):155-187. doi: 10.1086/675728.
4
Treatment Outcomes of African American Buprenorphine Patients by Parole and Probation Status.按假释和缓刑状态划分的非裔美国丁丙诺啡患者的治疗结果
J Drug Issues. 2014 Jan;44(1):69-82. doi: 10.1177/0022042613491106.
5
Comparative Effectiveness of California's Proposition 36 and Drug Court Programs Before and After Propensity Score Matching.加州第36号提案与药物法庭项目在倾向得分匹配前后的比较效果
Crime Delinq. 2014 Sep;60(6):909-938. doi: 10.1177/0011128710382342.
6
Organizational capacity for service integration in community-based addiction health services.社区成瘾健康服务中的服务整合组织能力。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Apr;104(4):e40-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301842. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
7
Driving while intoxicated among individuals initially untreated for alcohol use disorders: one- and sixteen-year follow-ups.初诊未治疗酒精使用障碍者的醉酒驾车行为:1 年和 16 年随访研究。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Mar;72(2):173-84. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.173.
8
Promising practices for delivery of court-supervised substance abuse treatment: perspectives from six high-performing California counties operating Proposition 36.法庭监管下药物滥用治疗的成功实践:来自加利福尼亚州六个实施第36号提案的高效县的观点
Eval Program Plann. 2011 May;34(2):124-34. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.09.001. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
9
Prisons as social determinants of hepatitis C virus and tuberculosis infections.监狱作为丙型肝炎病毒和结核病感染的社会决定因素。
Public Health Rep. 2010 Jul-Aug;125 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):25-33. doi: 10.1177/00333549101250S406.
10
Assessing the long-term impact of drug court participation on recidivism with generalized estimating equations.使用广义估计方程评估药物法庭参与对累犯的长期影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Nov 2;91(1):57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.05.011. Epub 2007 Jul 2.