• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

十二年的药物治疗法庭:揭示我们的理论基础与主流范式的构建

A dozen years of drug treatment courts: uncovering our theoretical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm.

作者信息

Hora Peggy Fulton

机构信息

Alameda County Superior Court, 24405 Amador St., Hayward, CA 94544, USA.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1469-88. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014419.

DOI:10.1081/ja-120014419
PMID:12487231
Abstract

The creation of the first drug treatment courts were in response to the revolving door of drug use and recidivism. There was no theoretical basis for these courts and no universal support for them. Twelve years have brought incredible changes. Therapeutic jurisprudence says, in essence, whether intended or not, that legal rules and procedures have therapeutic effects. Drug treatment courts have adopted principles of TJ to enhance their functioning. The Conference of Chief Justices recently issued a resolution supporting "problem-solving" courts. New trial court standards legitimize drug courts' procedures. Drug treatment courts are now mainstream and can no longer be seen as "boutique" courts staffed by renegade judges. Working therapeutically is an appropriate, effective, and productive way for the justice system to function.

摘要

首批戒毒治疗法庭的设立是为应对吸毒与累犯的恶性循环。这些法庭没有理论依据,也未得到普遍支持。十二年来发生了令人难以置信的变化。治疗法学实质上指出,无论是否有意,法律规则和程序都具有治疗效果。戒毒治疗法庭已采用治疗法学原则来提升其运作效能。首席大法官会议最近发布了一项决议,支持“问题解决型”法庭。新的审判法庭标准使戒毒法庭的程序合法化。戒毒治疗法庭如今已成为主流,再也不能被视为由叛逆法官组成的“精品”法庭。从治疗角度开展工作是司法系统运作的一种恰当、有效且富有成效的方式。

相似文献

1
A dozen years of drug treatment courts: uncovering our theoretical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm.十二年的药物治疗法庭:揭示我们的理论基础与主流范式的构建
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1469-88. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014419.
2
Drug treatment courts and the disease paradigm.药物治疗法庭与疾病范式。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1723-50. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014428.
3
The emergence of drug treatment courts in Australia.澳大利亚毒品治疗法庭的出现。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1567-94. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014422.
4
A decade of drug treatment court research.十年的药物治疗法庭研究。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1489-527. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014420.
5
Juvenile drug treatment courts in the United States: initial lessons learned and issues being addressed.美国青少年毒品治疗法庭:初步经验教训及正在解决的问题。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1689-722. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014427.
6
Drug treatment courts, British style: the drug treatment court movement in Britain.英式毒品治疗法庭:英国的毒品治疗法庭运动
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1595-614. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014423.
7
Treatment inside the drug treatment court: the who, what, where, and how of treatment services.药物治疗法庭内的治疗:治疗服务的对象、内容、地点及方式。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1665-88. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014426.
8
The challenges of conducting research in drug treatment court settings.在药物治疗法庭环境中开展研究的挑战。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1635-64. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014425.
9
Drug treatment courts--a viable option for Canada? Sentencing issues and preliminary findings from the Toronto court.毒品治疗法庭——加拿大的一个可行选择?量刑问题及多伦多法庭的初步调查结果。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1529-66. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014421.
10
Factors associated with completion of a drug treatment court diversion program.与药物治疗法庭分流计划完成情况相关的因素。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1615-33. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014424.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing a Recovery Capital Model Into Therapeutic Courts: Case Study and Lessons Learned.将康复资本模式应用于治疗性法庭:案例研究与经验教训
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2025 May;69(6-7):819-834. doi: 10.1177/0306624X231198810. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
2
Court as a health intervention to advance Canada's achievement of the sustainable development goals : a multi-pronged analysis of Vancouver's Downtown Community Court.作为一种健康干预手段的法院,以推进加拿大实现可持续发展目标:对温哥华市中心社区法院的多方面分析。
Global Health. 2019 Dec 18;15(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0511-9.
3
The Effects of the Addiction Programme of Probation on Treatment Motivation, Abstinence and Quality of Life: a Comparative Study with Motivational Interviewing and Individual Intervention.
缓刑成瘾项目对治疗动机、戒断及生活质量的影响:与动机性访谈和个体干预的比较研究
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2018 Jun 4;55(3):261-270. doi: 10.5152/npa.2017.19440. eCollection 2018 Sep.
4
Criminally Involved Parents Who Misuse Substances and Children's Odds of Being Arrested as a Young Adult: Do Drug Treatment Courts Mitigate the Risk?涉及犯罪且滥用药物的父母与子女年轻时被捕的几率:毒品治疗法庭能否降低风险?
J Child Fam Stud. 2016 Aug;25(8):2447-2457. doi: 10.1007/s10826-016-0406-9. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
5
Parental Criminal Justice Involvement and Children's Involvement With Child Protective Services: Do Adult Drug Treatment Courts Prevent Child Maltreatment?父母与刑事司法系统的关联及儿童与儿童保护服务的接触:成人毒品治疗法庭能预防儿童虐待吗?
Subst Use Misuse. 2016;51(2):179-92. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1089906. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
6
Intergenerational effects of parental substance-related convictions and adult drug treatment court participation on children's school performance.父母与毒品相关的定罪及参与成人戒毒法庭对儿童学业成绩的代际影响。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015 Sep;85(5):452-68. doi: 10.1037/ort0000087.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of California's Proposition 36 and Drug Court Programs Before and After Propensity Score Matching.加州第36号提案与药物法庭项目在倾向得分匹配前后的比较效果
Crime Delinq. 2014 Sep;60(6):909-938. doi: 10.1177/0011128710382342.
8
Racial-ethnic disparities in substance abuse treatment: the role of criminal history and socioeconomic status.种族-民族差异与物质滥用治疗:犯罪史和社会经济地位的作用。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Nov;62(11):1273-81. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.11.pss6211_1273.
9
Promising practices for delivery of court-supervised substance abuse treatment: perspectives from six high-performing California counties operating Proposition 36.法庭监管下药物滥用治疗的成功实践:来自加利福尼亚州六个实施第36号提案的高效县的观点
Eval Program Plann. 2011 May;34(2):124-34. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.09.001. Epub 2010 Sep 29.