Suppr超能文献

饮酒与肺癌风险:弗雷明汉研究

Alcohol consumption and risk of lung cancer: the Framingham Study.

作者信息

Djoussé Luc, Dorgan Joanne F, Zhang Yuqing, Schatzkin Arthur, Hood Maggie, D'Agostino Ralph B, Copenhafer Donna L, Kreger Bernard E, Ellison R Curtis

机构信息

Section of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Evans Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Dec 18;94(24):1877-82. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.24.1877.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reports on the association between alcohol consumption and the risk of lung cancer have been inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to assess this association in a cohort study.

METHODS

This study included 4265 participants in the original population-based Framingham Study cohort and 4973 subjects in the offspring cohort. Alcohol consumption data were collected periodically for both cohorts. We used the risk sets method to match control subjects to each case patient based on age, sex, smoking variables, and year of birth. We used a conditional logistic regression model to estimate the relative risk of lung cancer according to alcohol consumption.

RESULTS

Alcohol consumption was generally light to moderate (i.e., <12 g/day) in both cohorts. During mean follow-ups of 32.8 years in the original and 16.2 years in the offspring cohorts, 269 cases of lung cancer occurred. In categories of total alcohol consumption of 0, 0.1-12, 12.1-24, and greater than 24 g/day, the crude incidence rates of lung cancer were 7.4, 13.6, 16.4, and 25.2 cases per 10 000 person-years, respectively, in the original cohort and 6.6, 4.3, 7.9, and 12.3 cases per 10 000 person-years, respectively, in the offspring cohort. However, after adjustment for age, sex, pack-years of smoking, smoking status, and year of birth in a multivariable conditional logistic regression model, relative risks for lung cancer from the lowest to the highest category of alcohol consumption were 1.0 (referent), 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.5 to 2.1), 1.0 (95% CI = 0.5 to 2.3), and 1.1 (95% CI = 0.5 to 2.3), respectively, in the original cohort and 1.0, 1.4 (95% CI = 0.5 to 3.6), 1.1 (95% CI = 0.3 to 3.6), and 2.0 (95% CI = 0.7 to 5.7), respectively, in the offspring cohort.

CONCLUSION

Alcohol consumption among subjects in the Framingham Study, most of whom were light to moderate drinkers, was not statistically significantly associated with the risk of lung cancer.

摘要

背景

关于饮酒与肺癌风险之间关联的报道并不一致。本研究的目的是在一项队列研究中评估这种关联。

方法

本研究纳入了基于人群的原弗雷明汉研究队列中的4265名参与者以及子代队列中的4973名受试者。两个队列均定期收集饮酒数据。我们使用风险集方法,根据年龄、性别、吸烟变量和出生年份将对照受试者与每位病例患者进行匹配。我们使用条件逻辑回归模型来估计根据饮酒情况患肺癌的相对风险。

结果

两个队列中的饮酒量一般为轻度至中度(即<12克/天)。在原队列平均随访32.8年以及子代队列平均随访16.2年期间,共发生了269例肺癌病例。在原队列中,每日总饮酒量为0、0.1 - 12、12.1 - 24以及大于24克的类别中,肺癌的粗发病率分别为每10000人年7.4、13.6、16.4和25.2例;在子代队列中,相应的发病率分别为每10000人年6.6、4.3、7.9和12.3例。然而,在多变量条件逻辑回归模型中对年龄、性别、吸烟包年数、吸烟状态和出生年份进行调整后,原队列中从最低到最高饮酒量类别患肺癌的相对风险分别为1.0(参照)、1.0(95%置信区间[CI]=0.5至2.1)、1.0(95%CI = 0.5至2.3)和1.1(95%CI = 0.5至2.3);子代队列中相应的相对风险分别为1.0、1.4(95%CI = 0.5至3.6)、1.1(95%CI = 0.3至3.6)和2.0(95%CI = 0.7至5.7)。

结论

弗雷明汉研究中的受试者饮酒量大多为轻度至中度,饮酒与肺癌风险之间无统计学显著关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验