Baker Sharyn D, Verweij Jaap, Rowinsky Eric K, Donehower Ross C, Schellens Jan H M, Grochow Louise B, Sparreboom Alex
Division of Experimental Therapeutics, The Sydney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD 21237, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Dec 18;94(24):1883-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.24.1883.
The prescribed dose of anticancer agents is most commonly calculated using body surface area as the only independent variable, and it has been shown that this approach still results in large interpatient variability in drug exposure. Here, we retrospectively assessed the pharmacokinetics of 33 investigational agents tested in phase I trials from 1991 through 2001, as a function of body surface area in 1650 adult cancer patients. Twelve of the drugs were administered orally, 19 were administered intravenously, and two were administered by both routes. Body surface area-based dosing was statistically significantly associated with a reduction in interpatient variability in drug clearance for only five of the 33 agents: docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil/eniluracil, paclitaxel, temozolomide, and troxacitabine. These results do not support the use of body surface area in dose calculations and suggest that alternate dosing strategies should be evaluated. We conclude that body surface area should not be used to determine starting doses of investigational agents in future phase I studies.
抗癌药物的规定剂量最常通过将体表面积作为唯一自变量来计算,并且已经表明这种方法仍然会导致患者间药物暴露的巨大差异。在此,我们回顾性评估了1991年至2001年在I期试验中测试的33种研究药物的药代动力学,作为1650名成年癌症患者体表面积的函数。其中12种药物通过口服给药,19种通过静脉给药,2种通过两种途径给药。基于体表面积的给药在统计学上仅与33种药物中的5种药物清除率的患者间变异性降低显著相关:二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)-紫杉醇、5-氟尿嘧啶/依诺尿嘧啶、紫杉醇、替莫唑胺和曲西他滨。这些结果不支持在剂量计算中使用体表面积,并表明应评估替代给药策略。我们得出结论,在未来的I期研究中,不应使用体表面积来确定研究药物的起始剂量。