Suppr超能文献

血液学实验室重新审视的单变量增量检查法(I)——对血液系统疾病患者标本混淆检测的实用性

[Revisited univariate delta check method for hematologic laboratories (I)--Usefulness for detection of specimen mix-up in patients with hematologic disorders].

作者信息

Ohara Tomoko, Itoh Kouichi

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Jichi Medical School, Kawachi-gun, Tochigi-pref. 329-0498.

出版信息

Rinsho Byori. 2002 Nov;50(11):1072-5.

Abstract

We evaluated the delta check method for hematologic laboratories to detect specimen mix-up. We selected 271 patients with hematologic disorders and two types of investigation were conducted. The first investigation comprised statistical analysis, while the second involved evaluation of the procedure. From parameters of white blood cell, red blood cell, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin(MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and platelets, MCV was considered to represent the best single marker to detect artificial mix-up. About 98% of MCV delta values from one patient were within 3 fl. Conversely, 40% of MCV delta values in artificial mixups exceed 10 fl. No correlations between time interval and MCV delta values were detected. However, some cases were observed in which MCV delta values changed markedly over a short period of time even though the samples originated from one patient. In conclusion, we recommend investigation for specimen mix-up in cases where MCV delta values exceed 4 fl.

摘要

我们评估了血液学实验室用于检测标本混淆的差值检查法。我们选取了271例血液系统疾病患者,并进行了两种类型的调查。第一次调查包括统计分析,而第二次调查涉及对该程序的评估。从白细胞、红细胞、血红蛋白、血细胞比容、平均红细胞体积(MCV)、平均红细胞血红蛋白(MCH)、平均红细胞血红蛋白浓度(MCHC)和血小板的参数来看,MCV被认为是检测人为混淆的最佳单一标志物。来自同一患者的MCV差值约98%在3飞升以内。相反,人为混淆样本中40%的MCV差值超过10飞升。未检测到时间间隔与MCV差值之间的相关性。然而,观察到一些病例,即使样本来自同一患者,MCV差值在短时间内也会显著变化。总之,我们建议在MCV差值超过4飞升的情况下调查标本是否混淆。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验