Brannigan G G, Calnen T, Loprete L J, Rosenberg L A
J Clin Psychol. 1976 Jan;32(1):94. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197601)32:1<94::aid-jclp2270320128>3.0.co;2-p.
Ten graduate students scored items from the comprehension, similarities, and vocabulary subtests. Five used the WISC manual anf five used the WISC-R manual. Higher percentages of interscorer agreement were obtained from the WISC-R group on all three subtests. An analysis of two-point discrepancies among scorers further supported the superiority of the WISC-R scoring standards over those the WISC.
十名研究生对理解、相似性和词汇子测验的项目进行了评分。五人使用韦氏儿童智力量表手册,五人使用韦氏儿童智力量表修订版手册。在所有三个子测验中,韦氏儿童智力量表修订版组的评分者间一致性百分比更高。对评分者之间两点差异的分析进一步支持了韦氏儿童智力量表修订版评分标准比韦氏儿童智力量表评分标准更具优越性。