Suppr超能文献

三种预测肺大部切除术后并发症的评分系统的比较。

A comparison of three scoring systems for predicting complications after major lung resection.

作者信息

Ferguson Mark K, Durkin Amy E

机构信息

Section of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue MC5035, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Jan;23(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00675-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although complications occur frequently after major lung resection, current predictive models are not entirely satisfactory. We devised a new predictive scoring system and compared it to two existing systems.

METHODS

We performed an initial retrospective review of 400 patients who underwent major resection for lung cancer from 1980 to 1995. Predictive covariates (age, spirometry, diffusing capacity) associated with three or more complication groups were used to develop a scoring system. This system (EVAD) was then evaluated against the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) and Cardiopulmonary Risk Index (CPRI) systems for patients operated between 1996 and 2001.

RESULTS

Major resection for lung cancer included lobectomy (188) and pneumonectomy (30). Complication categories were: pulmonary (23; 10.5%); cardiovascular (24; 11.0%); infectious (8; 3.6%); other (29; 13.2%); nonfatal (45; 20.6%); and any (53; 24.2%). Death occurred in ten patients (4.6%). Mean EVAD scores were significantly different between groups with and without complications in all categories except infectious complications and death, whereas mean CPRI scores differed only for pulmonary complications, nonfatal complications, and death, and mean POSSUM scores did not appropriately differ for any complications. EVAD predicted incremental risk in all complication categories except cardiovascular, infectious, and death, whereas CPRI predicted incremental risk only for nonfatal and possibly any complications, and POSSUM did not predict incremental risk for any complication category. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated the EVAD system to be equivalent to or better than CPRI and POSSUM for all complication categories.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple scoring system (EVAD) that utilizes pulmonary function test data and patient age predicts the likelihood of complications after major lung resection. It is easier to use and at least as accurate as other scoring systems currently in use.

摘要

目的

尽管在肺大部切除术后并发症频繁发生,但目前的预测模型并不完全令人满意。我们设计了一种新的预测评分系统,并将其与两种现有的系统进行比较。

方法

我们对1980年至1995年接受肺癌肺大部切除术的400例患者进行了初步回顾性研究。与三个或更多并发症组相关的预测协变量(年龄、肺功能测定、弥散功能)被用于开发一个评分系统。然后,针对1996年至2001年接受手术的患者,将该系统(EVAD)与生理和手术严重程度评分系统(用于计算死亡率和发病率,POSSUM)以及心肺风险指数(CPRI)系统进行评估。

结果

肺癌肺大部切除术包括肺叶切除术(188例)和全肺切除术(30例)。并发症类别包括:肺部(23例;10.5%);心血管(24例;11.0%);感染性(8例;3.6%);其他(29例;13.2%);非致命性(45例;20.6%);以及任何并发症(53例;24.2%)。10例患者死亡(4.6%)。除感染性并发症和死亡外,在所有类别中,有并发症组和无并发症组的平均EVAD评分均有显著差异,而平均CPRI评分仅在肺部并发症、非致命性并发症和死亡方面存在差异,平均POSSUM评分在任何并发症方面均无适当差异。除心血管、感染性和死亡外,EVAD在所有并发症类别中均预测了增量风险,而CPRI仅预测了非致命性以及可能的任何并发症的增量风险,POSSUM未预测任何并发症类别的增量风险。受试者工作特征分析表明,在所有并发症类别中,EVAD系统等同于或优于CPRI和POSSUM。

结论

一种利用肺功能测试数据和患者年龄的简单评分系统(EVAD)可预测肺大部切除术后并发症的可能性。它使用更简便,且至少与目前使用的其他评分系统一样准确。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验