Inoue Lurdes Y T, Thall Peter F, Berry Donald A
Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Box 357232, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Biometrics. 2002 Dec;58(4):823-31. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00823.x.
A sequential Bayesian phase II/III design is proposed for comparative clinical trials. The design is based on both survival time and discrete early events that may be related to survival and assumes a parametric mixture model. Phase II involves a small number of centers. Patients are randomized between treatments throughout, and sequential decisions are based on predictive probabilities of concluding superiority of the experimental treatment. Whether to stop early, continue, or shift into phase III is assessed repeatedly in phase II. Phase III begins when additional institutions are incorporated into the ongoing phase II trial. Simulation studies in the context of a non-small-cell lung cancer trial indicate that the proposed method maintains overall size and power while usually requiring substantially smaller sample size and shorter trial duration when compared with conventional group-sequential phase III designs.
本文提出了一种用于比较临床试验的序贯贝叶斯II/III期设计。该设计基于生存时间和可能与生存相关的离散早期事件,并假设了一个参数混合模型。II期涉及少数几个中心。患者在整个治疗过程中随机分配,序贯决策基于得出实验性治疗优越性的预测概率。在II期反复评估是否提前终止、继续或转入III期。当将其他机构纳入正在进行的II期试验时,III期开始。在非小细胞肺癌试验背景下的模拟研究表明,与传统的成组序贯III期设计相比,所提出的方法在保持总体规模和检验效能的同时,通常需要显著更小的样本量和更短的试验持续时间。