Price Cathy J, Friston Karl J
Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Neurocase. 2002;8(5):345-54. doi: 10.1076/neur.8.4.345.16186.
Functional imaging studies of neuropsychologically impaired patients have not enjoyed the immediate success that was attained by functional imaging studies of normal subjects. This is largely because it has taken time to appreciate some of the deeper issues surrounding study design, analysis and interpretation. The most significant limitation is that functional imaging experiments with patients need tasks that the patients can perform. This precludes direct investigations of the physiological correlates of cognitive deficits. Nevertheless, functional imaging studies of brain-damaged patients who retain task competence can provide information that is not available from structural imaging, behavioural assessments or functional imaging with normal subjects. This is because intact task performance, following a brain lesion, does not necessarily entail normal neuronal responses in undamaged cortical areas. Abnormal neuronal responses, in the context of normal performance, can indicate alternative neuronal and cognitive mechanisms for supporting the same task. This, in turn, has important implications for understanding the mechanisms that mediate recovery and the organizational principles that underlie functional architectures in the human brain.
对神经心理受损患者进行的功能成像研究,并未像对正常受试者进行的功能成像研究那样立即取得成功。这主要是因为认识到围绕研究设计、分析和解释的一些更深层次的问题需要时间。最显著的限制是,针对患者的功能成像实验需要患者能够执行的任务。这排除了对认知缺陷的生理相关性进行直接研究的可能性。然而,对保留任务能力的脑损伤患者进行的功能成像研究,可以提供从结构成像、行为评估或对正常受试者进行的功能成像中无法获得的信息。这是因为脑损伤后完整的任务表现,并不一定意味着未受损皮质区域的神经元反应正常。在正常表现的情况下,异常的神经元反应可以表明支持同一任务的替代神经元和认知机制。反过来,这对于理解介导恢复的机制以及人类大脑功能结构所依据的组织原则具有重要意义。