Suppr超能文献

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)各亚型的神经心理学表现:一项针对未接受治疗青少年的探索性研究

Neuropsychological performance in DSM-IV ADHD subtypes: an exploratory study with untreated adolescents.

作者信息

Schmitz Marcelo, Cadore Luciana, Paczko Marcelo, Kipper Letícia, Chaves Márcia, Rohde Luis A, Moura Clarissa, Knijnik Márcia

机构信息

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;47(9):863-9. doi: 10.1177/070674370204700908.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore neuropsychological performance in untreated Brazilian adolescents suffering from attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

METHOD

We assessed 30 untreated adolescents with ADHD and 60 healthy control subjects, aged 12 to 16 years, using a neuropsychological battery including the Wisconsin Card-Sorting Test (WCST), the Stroop Test (ST), the Digit Span, and the Word Span.

RESULTS

We found neuropsychological differences among the DSM-IV ADHD subtypes. Adolescents with the predominantly inattentive subtype (ADHD-I) performed more poorly than did control subjects on both the Digit Span and the ST. On both the Digit Span and the WCST, adolescents with the combined subtype (ADHD-C) presented significantly more impairments than did control subjects. Adolescents with the predominantly hyperactive-impulsive type (ADHD-HI) did not differ significantly from the control subjects in any measure assessed, but had a better performance than did those with ADHD-C on both the Digit Span and the WCST. In addition, adolescents with ADHD-HI performed better on the ST than did adolescents with ADHD-I.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest cognitive differences among ADHD subtypes, supporting the diagnostic distinction among them. Adolescents with ADHD-HI do not seem to have significant cognitive deficits.

摘要

目的

探讨未接受治疗的患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的巴西青少年的神经心理表现。

方法

我们使用包括威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)、斯特鲁普测验(ST)、数字广度和单词广度的神经心理成套测验,对30名未接受治疗的患有ADHD的青少年和60名年龄在12至16岁的健康对照者进行了评估。

结果

我们发现DSM-IV ADHD各亚型之间存在神经心理差异。注意力不集中为主型(ADHD-I)的青少年在数字广度和斯特鲁普测验上的表现均比对照者差。在数字广度和WCST上,混合型(ADHD-C)的青少年比对照者表现出明显更多的损伤。多动冲动为主型(ADHD-HI)的青少年在任何评估指标上与对照者均无显著差异,但在数字广度和WCST上比ADHD-C的青少年表现更好。此外,ADHD-HI的青少年在斯特鲁普测验上的表现比ADHD-I的青少年更好。

结论

这些发现表明ADHD各亚型之间存在认知差异,支持对它们进行诊断区分。ADHD-HI的青少年似乎没有明显的认知缺陷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验