Khanna Rajesh, Taneja Vikas, Singh Saroj K, Kumar Nirmal, Sreenivas V, Puliyel Jacob M
Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, St. Stephen's Hospital, Tis Hazari, Delhi, India.
Indian J Pediatr. 2002 Nov;69(11):957-60. doi: 10.1007/BF02726013.
To assess the usefulness of clinical risk index of babies (CRIB score) in predicting neonatal mortality in extremely preterm neonates, compared to birth weight and gestation.
97 preterm neonates with gestational age less than 31 weeks or birth weight less than or equal to 1500 g were enrolled for the prospective longitudinal study. Relevant neonatal data was recorded. Blood gas analysis results and the maximum and the minimum FiO2 required by babies in first 12 hours of life were noted. Mortality was taken as death while the baby was in nursery. The prediction of mortality by birth weight, gestational age and CRIB score was done using the Logistic model, and expressed as area under the ROC curve.
The area under the ROC curve for birth weight, gestational age and CRIB score was almost the same, the areas being 0.829, 0.819 and 0.823 respectively. Hence CRIB score did not fare better than birth weight and gestational age in predicting neonatal mortality.
The CRIB score did not improve on the ability of birth weight and gestational age to predict neonatal mortality in the study.
与出生体重和孕周相比,评估婴儿临床风险指数(CRIB评分)在预测极早产儿新生儿死亡率方面的效用。
97例孕周小于31周或出生体重小于或等于1500克的早产儿被纳入前瞻性纵向研究。记录相关的新生儿数据。记录血气分析结果以及婴儿出生后12小时内所需的最高和最低吸入氧浓度(FiO2)。死亡率定义为婴儿在新生儿重症监护室期间死亡。使用逻辑模型通过出生体重、孕周和CRIB评分预测死亡率,并以ROC曲线下面积表示。
出生体重、孕周和CRIB评分的ROC曲线下面积几乎相同,分别为0.829、0.819和0.823。因此,在预测新生儿死亡率方面,CRIB评分并不优于出生体重和孕周。
在本研究中,CRIB评分在预测新生儿死亡率方面并未优于出生体重和孕周的预测能力。