• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 SNAPPE- II 评分评估新生儿重症监护病房的新生儿死亡率。

Neonatal mortality risk assessment using SNAPPE- II score in a neonatal intensive care unit.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, B.P, Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), Dharan, Nepal.

Department of Pediatrics, University College of Medical sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2019 Aug 13;19(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1660-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-019-1660-y
PMID:31409303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6691535/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are many scoring systems to predict neonatal mortality and morbidity in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). One of the scoring systems is SNAPPE-II (Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal extension-II). This study was carried out to assess the validity of SNAPPE-II score (Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal Extension-II) as a predictor of neonatal mortality and duration of stay in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

METHODS

This prospective, observational study was carried out over a period of 12 months from June 2015 to May 2016. Two hundred fifty five neonates, who met the inclusion criteria admitted to NICU in tertiary care hospital, BPKIHS Hospital, Nepal were enrolled in the study and SNAPPE-II score was calculated. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to derive the best SNAPPE-II cut-off score for mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 305 neonates were admitted to NICU over a period of one year. Among them, 255 neonates fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Out of 255 neonates, 45 neonates (17.6%) died and 210 were discharged. SNAPPE-II score was significantly higher among neonates who died compared to those who survived [median (IQR) 57 (42-64) vs. 22 (14-32), P < 0.001]. SNAPPE II score had discrimination to predict mortality with area under ROC Curve (AUC): 0.917 (95% CI, 0.854-0.980). The best cut - off score for predicting mortality was 38 with sensitivity 84.4%, specificity 91%, positive predictive value 66.7% and negative predictive value 96.5%. SNAPPE II score could not predict the duration of NICU stay (P = 0.477).

CONCLUSION

SNAPPE- II is a useful tool to predict neonatal mortality in NICU. The score of 38 may be associated with higher mortality.

摘要

背景

有许多评分系统可用于预测新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中的新生儿死亡率和发病率。其中一个评分系统是 SNAPPE-II(围产期扩展的新生儿急性生理学评分-II)。本研究旨在评估 SNAPPE-II 评分(围产期扩展的新生儿急性生理学评分-II)作为预测新生儿死亡率和在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中停留时间的有效性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性观察研究,于 2015 年 6 月至 2016 年 5 月期间进行。在尼泊尔 BPKIHS 医院的三级保健医院的 NICU 中,符合纳入标准的 255 名新生儿被纳入研究,并计算了 SNAPPE-II 评分。构建受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以得出死亡率的最佳 SNAPPE-II 截断评分。

结果

在一年的时间里,共有 305 名新生儿入住 NICU。其中,255 名新生儿符合纳入标准。在 255 名新生儿中,有 45 名(17.6%)死亡,210 名出院。死亡的新生儿的 SNAPPE-II 评分明显高于存活的新生儿[中位数(IQR)57(42-64)比 22(14-32),P<0.001]。SNAPPE II 评分具有预测死亡率的区分能力,ROC 曲线下面积(AUC):0.917(95%CI,0.854-0.980)。预测死亡率的最佳截断分数为 38,灵敏度为 84.4%,特异性为 91%,阳性预测值为 66.7%,阴性预测值为 96.5%。SNAPPE-II 评分不能预测 NICU 停留时间(P=0.477)。

结论

SNAPPE-II 是预测 NICU 新生儿死亡率的有用工具。评分 38 可能与更高的死亡率相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6a/6691535/5267ccb96d25/12887_2019_1660_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6a/6691535/5267ccb96d25/12887_2019_1660_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6a/6691535/5267ccb96d25/12887_2019_1660_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Neonatal mortality risk assessment using SNAPPE- II score in a neonatal intensive care unit.使用 SNAPPE- II 评分评估新生儿重症监护病房的新生儿死亡率。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Aug 13;19(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1660-y.
2
SNAPPE-II (Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal Extension-II) in Predicting Mortality and Morbidity in NICU.SNAPPE-II(新生儿急性生理学与围产期扩展评分-II)在预测新生儿重症监护病房的死亡率和发病率中的应用
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):SC10-2. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14848.6677. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
3
Utilization of SNAP II and SNAPPE II Scores for Predicting the Mortality Rate Among a Cohort of Iranian Newborns.利用 SNAP II 和 SNAPPE II 评分预测伊朗新生儿队列的死亡率。
Arch Iran Med. 2018 Apr 1;21(4):153-157.
4
SNAPPE II Score as a Predictor of Neonatal Mortality in NICU at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan.SNAPPE II评分作为巴基斯坦一家三级护理医院新生儿重症监护病房新生儿死亡率的预测指标
Cureus. 2021 Dec 15;13(12):e20427. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20427. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Comparison of CRIB-II with SNAPPE-II for predicting survival and morbidities before hospital discharge in neonates with gestation ≤ 32 weeks: a prospective multicentric observational study.比较 CRIB-II 与 SNAPPE-II 预测胎龄≤32 周新生儿出院前的生存和发病情况的比较:一项前瞻性多中心观察研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Jul;181(7):2831-2838. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04463-2. Epub 2022 May 6.
6
[Predicting outcome in necrotizing enterocolitis with the score for neonatal acute physiology: a retrospective study of 62 cases].[用新生儿急性生理学评分预测坏死性小肠结肠炎的预后:62例回顾性研究]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013 May;51(5):326-30.
7
SNAPPE II: ANALYSIS OF ACCURACY AND DETERMINATION OF THE CUTOFF POINT AS A DEATH PREDICTOR IN A BRAZILIAN NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT.SNAPPE II:巴西新生儿重症监护病房中死亡率预测的准确性分析和截断点的确定。
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2020 Dec 16;38:e2019029. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2020/38/2019029. eCollection 2020.
8
Comparison of STOPS and SNAPPE-II in Predicting Neonatal Survival at Hospital Discharge: A Prospective, Multicentric, Observational Study.STOPS 和 SNAPPE-II 预测新生儿出院时生存的比较:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究。
Indian J Pediatr. 2023 Aug;90(8):781-786. doi: 10.1007/s12098-022-04330-w. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
9
Using Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology Perinatal Extension II (SNAPPE II) in Neonates with Acute Kidney Injury.在急性肾损伤新生儿中使用新生儿急性生理学围产期扩展评分 II(SNAPPE II)
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Sep 14;7(21):3559-3563. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.762. eCollection 2019 Nov 15.
10
Assessing outcome in interhospital infant transport: the transport risk index of physiologic stability score at admission.评估院际婴儿转运中的结局:入院时生理稳定性评分的转运风险指数。
Am J Perinatol. 2012 Aug;29(7):509-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310521. Epub 2012 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a risk score to predict neonatal mortality among NICU admissions in Southern Ethiopia: a retrospective follow-up study.埃塞俄比亚南部新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院患儿中预测新生儿死亡率的风险评分的开发与验证:一项回顾性随访研究
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jun 12;13:1496019. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1496019. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative Assessment of the Critical Condition of Newborns with Congenital Anomalies on the Basis of Different Scales.基于不同量表对先天性异常新生儿危急状况的比较评估
Turk Arch Pediatr. 2025 Mar 7;60(2):182-190. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24205.
3
Neonatal death prediction scores: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
SNAPPE-II (Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal Extension-II) in Predicting Mortality and Morbidity in NICU.SNAPPE-II(新生儿急性生理学与围产期扩展评分-II)在预测新生儿重症监护病房的死亡率和发病率中的应用
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):SC10-2. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14848.6677. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
2
SNAP II and SNAPPE II as Predictors of Neonatal Mortality in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Does Postnatal Age Play a Role?SNAP II和SNAPPE II作为儿科重症监护病房新生儿死亡率的预测指标:出生后年龄起作用吗?
Int J Pediatr. 2014;2014:298198. doi: 10.1155/2014/298198. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
3
Interinstitutional variation in prediction of death by SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II among extremely preterm infants.
新生儿死亡预测评分:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Dec 24;8(1):e003067. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003067.
4
Predictors of mortality and severe illness from Escherichia coli sepsis in neonates.预测新生儿大肠埃希菌败血症的死亡率和重症病例的因素。
J Perinatol. 2024 Dec;44(12):1816-1821. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02117-9. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
5
Early prediction of need for invasive mechanical ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit using artificial intelligence and electronic health records: a clinical study.使用人工智能和电子健康记录对新生儿重症监护病房中需要有创机械通气进行早期预测:一项临床研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Oct 23;23(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04350-1.
6
Outcomes of neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid pre and post 2015 NRP guideline implementation.2015 年前后实施新生儿复苏指南前后胎粪污染羊水新生儿的结局。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 10;18(8):e0289945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289945. eCollection 2023.
7
A Study of the Prediction of Mortality in a Tertiary Care Hospital Using the Modified Sick Neonatal Score (MSNS): An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.一项使用改良新生儿疾病评分(MSNS)预测三级护理医院死亡率的研究:一项观察性横断面研究。
Cureus. 2023 May 3;15(5):e38484. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38484. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Determining resuscitation threshold for extremely preterm infants based on the survival rates without severe neurological injury.基于无严重神经损伤生存率来确定极早产儿的复苏阈值。
J Glob Health. 2023 May 26;13:04059. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04059.
9
Comparison of STOPS and SNAPPE-II in Predicting Neonatal Survival at Hospital Discharge: A Prospective, Multicentric, Observational Study.STOPS 和 SNAPPE-II 预测新生儿出院时生存的比较:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究。
Indian J Pediatr. 2023 Aug;90(8):781-786. doi: 10.1007/s12098-022-04330-w. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
10
Post-transport TOPS score as a predictive marker of mortality among transported neonates and its comparative analysis with SNAP-II PE.转运后TOPS评分作为转运新生儿死亡率的预测指标及其与SNAP-II PE的比较分析
Heliyon. 2022 Aug 9;8(8):e10165. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10165. eCollection 2022 Aug.
SNAP-II和SNAPPE-II对极早产儿死亡预测的机构间差异。
Pediatrics. 2009 Nov;124(5):e1001-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3233. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
4
Revalidation of the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology in the Vermont Oxford Network.佛蒙特牛津网络新生儿急性生理学评分的重新验证
Pediatrics. 2007 Jan;119(1):e156-63. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2957. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
5
Profile of neonates admitted in pediatric ICU and validation of Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP).入住儿科重症监护病房的新生儿概况及新生儿急性生理学评分(SNAP)的验证
Indian Pediatr. 2006 Apr;43(4):344-8.
6
A new score for predicting neonatal very low birth weight mortality risk in the NEOCOSUR South American Network.一种用于预测南美NEOCOSUR网络中新生儿极低出生体重死亡风险的新评分系统。
J Perinatol. 2005 Sep;25(9):577-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211362.
7
[An assessment of the severity, proportionality and risk of mortality of very low birth weight infants with fetal growth restriction. A multicenter South American analysis].[对患有胎儿生长受限的极低出生体重儿的严重程度、比例及死亡风险的评估。一项南美洲多中心分析]
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2005 May-Jun;81(3):198-204.
8
The clinical risk index of babies (CRIB) score in India.印度婴儿临床风险指数(CRIB)评分
Indian J Pediatr. 2002 Nov;69(11):957-60. doi: 10.1007/BF02726013.
9
Role of score for neonatal acute physiology (SNAP) in predicting neonatal mortality.新生儿急性生理学评分(SNAP)在预测新生儿死亡率中的作用。
Indian J Pediatr. 2001 Sep;68(9):829-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02762105.
10
SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: Simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores.SNAP-II和SNAPPE-II:简化的新生儿疾病严重程度及死亡风险评分。
J Pediatr. 2001 Jan;138(1):92-100. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.109608.