Curnow W J
Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Mar;35(2):287-92. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00012-x.
An examination is made of a meta-analysis by Attewell, Glase and McFadden which concludes that bicycle helmets prevent serious injury, to the brain in particular, and that there is mounting scientific evidence of this. The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) initiated and directed the meta-analysis of 16 observational studies dated 1987-1998. This examination concentrates on injury to the brain and shows that the meta-analysis and its included studies take no account of scientific knowledge of its mechanisms. Consequently, the choice of studies for the meta-analysis and the collection, treatment and interpretation of their data lack the guidance needed to distinguish injuries caused through fracture of the skull and by angular acceleration. It is shown that the design of helmets reflects a discredited theory of brain injury. The conclusions are that the meta-analysis does not provide scientific evidence that such helmets reduce serious injury to the brain, and the Australian policy of compulsory wearing lacks a basis of verified efficacy against brain injury.
对阿特韦尔、格拉斯和麦克法登的一项荟萃分析进行了审视,该分析得出结论称自行车头盔可预防严重伤害,尤其是对大脑的伤害,且有越来越多的科学证据证明这一点。澳大利亚交通安全局(ATSB)发起并指导了对1987年至1998年期间16项观察性研究的荟萃分析。此次审视聚焦于脑部损伤,结果表明该荟萃分析及其纳入的研究并未考虑到其损伤机制的科学知识。因此,荟萃分析中研究的选择以及这些研究数据的收集、处理和解读缺乏区分因颅骨骨折和角加速度导致的损伤所需的指导。结果表明头盔的设计反映了一种已被质疑的脑损伤理论。结论是,该荟萃分析并未提供科学证据证明此类头盔可减少对大脑的严重伤害,而且澳大利亚强制佩戴头盔的政策缺乏经证实的预防脑损伤功效的依据。