Attewell R G, Glase K, McFadden M
Covance Pty Ltd, Ainslie, ACT, Australia.
Accid Anal Prev. 2001 May;33(3):345-52. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00048-8.
Bicycle helmet efficacy was quantified using a formal meta-analytic approach based on peer-reviewed studies. Only those studies with individual injury and helmet use data were included. Based on studies from several countries published in the period 1987-1998, the summary odds ratio estimate for efficacy is 0.40 (95% confidence interval 0.29, 0.55) for head injury, 0.42 (0.26, 0.67) for brain injury, 0.53 (0.39, 0.73) for facial injury and 0.27 (0.10, 0.71) for fatal injury. This indicates a statistically significant protective effect of helmets. Three studies provided neck injury results that were unfavourable to helmets with a summary estimate of 1.36 (1.00, 1.86), but this result may not be applicable to the lighter helmets currently in use. In conclusion, the evidence is clear that bicycle helmets prevent serious injury and even death. Despite this, the use of helmets is sub-optimal. Helmet use for all riders should be further encouraged to the extent that it is uniformly accepted and analogous to the use of seat belts by motor vehicle occupants.
基于同行评审研究,采用正式的荟萃分析方法对自行车头盔的功效进行了量化。仅纳入了那些有个体损伤和头盔使用数据的研究。根据1987年至1998年期间在几个国家发表的研究,头部损伤的功效汇总比值比估计为0.40(95%置信区间0.29,0.55),脑损伤为0.42(0.26,0.67),面部损伤为0.53(0.39,0.73),致命损伤为0.27(0.10,0.71)。这表明头盔具有统计学上显著的保护作用。三项研究提供的颈部损伤结果对头盔不利,汇总估计为1.36(1.00,1.86),但该结果可能不适用于目前使用的较轻头盔。总之,证据明确表明自行车头盔可预防严重损伤甚至死亡。尽管如此,头盔的使用仍未达到最佳状态。应进一步鼓励所有骑行者使用头盔,使其达到被普遍接受的程度,并类似于机动车驾乘人员使用安全带的情况。