Suppr超能文献

用于缓解症状的镇静的定义:一项系统文献综述及操作标准建议

Definition of sedation for symptom relief: a systematic literature review and a proposal of operational criteria.

作者信息

Morita Tatsuya, Tsuneto Satoru, Shima Yasuo

机构信息

Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, 3453 Mika-tabara-cho, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 433-8558, Japan.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Oct;24(4):447-53. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00499-2.

Abstract

Although sedation for symptom relief in terminally ill patients has been the focus of recent medical studies, the interpretation of research findings is difficult due to the confusing terminology. To clarify the agreements and inconsistencies in the definitions of sedation, a systematic review was performed. We searched the literature through MEDLINE from 1990 to July 2001. A total of 7 articles met the inclusion criteria. All studies included the use of sedative medications or the intention to reduce patient consciousness as an essential element of sedation. All but one study explicitly described that the primary aim of sedation was symptom palliation. Three definitions stated that target symptoms were severe, and 4 articles reported the refractory nature of the distress. On the other hand, there were marked inconsistencies in the definition of the degree of sedation, duration, pharmacological properties of medications used, target symptoms, and target populations. This review suggests that sedation includes two core factors: the presence of severe suffering refractory to standard palliative management, and the use of sedative medications with the primary aim to relieve distress. Thus, "palliative sedation therapy" can be defined as "the use of sedative medications to relieve intolerable and refractory distress by the reduction in patient consciousness." The marked inconsistencies in the definition of sedation should be considered to be subcategories of palliative sedation therapy, and we recommend that researchers define the degree of sedation, duration, pharmacological properties of medications, target symptoms, and target populations in future studies. This clarification of terminology will contribute to improving the accuracy and depth of sedation research.

摘要

尽管为终末期患者缓解症状而进行的镇静治疗一直是近期医学研究的重点,但由于术语混乱,研究结果的解读存在困难。为了厘清镇静定义中的共识与分歧,我们进行了一项系统综述。我们通过MEDLINE检索了1990年至2001年7月的文献。共有7篇文章符合纳入标准。所有研究均将使用镇静药物或降低患者意识的意图作为镇静的基本要素。除一项研究外,所有研究均明确指出镇静的主要目的是缓解症状。三个定义指出目标症状严重,4篇文章报道了痛苦的难治性。另一方面,在镇静程度、持续时间、所用药物的药理学特性、目标症状和目标人群的定义上存在明显分歧。本综述表明,镇静包括两个核心因素:存在对标准姑息治疗难治的严重痛苦,以及使用镇静药物主要目的是缓解痛苦。因此,“姑息性镇静治疗”可定义为“通过降低患者意识使用镇静药物缓解无法忍受和难治的痛苦”。镇静定义中的明显分歧应被视为姑息性镇静治疗的子类别,我们建议研究人员在未来研究中明确镇静程度、持续时间、药物的药理学特性、目标症状和目标人群。术语的这种厘清将有助于提高镇静研究的准确性和深度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验