Haider Agha W, Larson Martin G, Franklin Stanley S, Levy Daniel
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts 01702-5827, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jan 7;138(1):10-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00006.
Although hypertension is a principal precursor of congestive heart failure (CHF), the separate relations of systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure with risk for heart failure have not been fully elucidated.
To examine the value of blood pressure predictors of heart failure.
Community-based inception cohort study.
Framingham, Massachusetts.
2040 free-living Framingham Heart Study participants (mean age, 61 years [range, 50 to 79 years]).
The association of baseline systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure with risk for incident CHF was examined in 894 men and 1146 women. Framingham Heart Study participants free of CHF at the baseline examination (performed from 1968 to 1973) were monitored for up to 24 years (mean, 17.4 years) for new-onset heart failure. Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for age, sex, smoking, left ventricular hypertrophy, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, and heart rate; hazard ratios and 95% CIs for blood pressure variables were estimated.
CHF developed in 234 participants (11.8%) during the follow-up period. All three blood pressure components were related to the risk for CHF, but the relation was strongest for systolic and pulse pressure. A 1-SD (20 mm Hg) increment in systolic pressure conferred a 56% increased risk for CHF (hazard ratio, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.37 to 1.77]); similarly, a 1-SD (16 mm Hg) increment in pulse pressure conferred a 55% increased risk for CHF (hazard ratio, 1.55 [CI, 1.37 to 1.75]). These associations were unrelated to age, duration of follow-up, and initiation of treatment for hypertension during follow-up; they were also observed in patients with systolic hypertension (systolic blood pressure > or = 140 mm Hg) at the baseline examination (hazard ratio, 1.41 [CI, 1.18 to 1.69] for pulse pressure and 1.42 [CI, 1.14 to 1.76] for systolic pressure).
Although each component of blood pressure was associated with risk for CHF, pulse and systolic pressure conferred greater risk than diastolic pressure. Increased pulse pressure may help identify hypertensive patients at high risk for overt CHF who are candidates for aggressive blood pressure control.
尽管高血压是充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的主要先兆,但收缩压、舒张压和脉压与心力衰竭风险之间的独立关系尚未完全阐明。
研究心力衰竭的血压预测指标的价值。
基于社区的起始队列研究。
马萨诸塞州弗雷明汉。
2040名弗雷明汉心脏研究的自由生活参与者(平均年龄61岁[范围50至79岁])。
在894名男性和1146名女性中,研究基线收缩压、舒张压和脉压与发生CHF风险之间的关联。对在基线检查(1968年至1973年进行)时无CHF的弗雷明汉心脏研究参与者进行长达24年(平均17.4年)的新发心力衰竭监测。使用Cox比例风险模型对年龄、性别、吸烟、左心室肥厚、体重指数、糖尿病、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平和心率进行校正;估计血压变量的风险比和95%可信区间。
随访期间234名参与者(11.8%)发生了CHF。所有三个血压成分均与CHF风险相关,但收缩压和脉压的相关性最强。收缩压升高1个标准差(20mmHg)使CHF风险增加56%(风险比,1.56[95%可信区间,1.37至1.77]);同样,脉压升高1个标准差(16mmHg)使CHF风险增加55%(风险比,1.55[可信区间,1.37至1.75])。这些关联与年龄、随访时间和随访期间高血压治疗的开始无关;在基线检查时收缩期高血压(收缩压≥140mmHg)患者中也观察到了这些关联(脉压的风险比为1.41[可信区间,1.18至1.69],收缩压的风险比为1.42[可信区间,1.14至1.76])。
尽管血压的每个成分都与CHF风险相关,但脉压和收缩压比舒张压带来的风险更大。脉压升高可能有助于识别有明显CHF高风险的高血压患者,这些患者是积极控制血压的候选对象。