Yang Deqi, Tong Fuzhong, Cao Yingming, Liu Peng, Zhou Bo, Liu Hongjun, Qiao Xinmin, Zhang Jiaqing
Department of Surgery IV, People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2002 May;24(3):303-5.
To compare the efficacy and toxicity of two different regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Forty-eight patients with stage II, III breast cancer as proved by cytology biopsy, were treated with either 5-Fu, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) or epirubicin, paclitaxel (ET) regimens for 2 cycles every 3 - 4 weeks. Clinical responses in the breast and lymph nodes were assessed after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients in FEC arm received combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) 500 mg/m(2) by 4-hour continuous infusion on D1 and D8, epirubicin (EPI) 50 mg/m(2) by intravenous injection on D1, and cyclophosphamide (CTX) 500 mg/m(2) by intravenous injection on D1 and D8. Patients assigned to the ET arm received EPI 60 mg/m(2) by intravenous injection on D1, paclitaxel (TAX) 150 mg/m(2) by 3-hour continuous infusion on D2. All patients were treated by operation 2 weeks later and radiotherapy was added to some.
For primary tumor in the breast, the overall response rate (RR) was 50.0% (12/24) in FEC arm and 79.2% (19/24) in ET arm. One patient showed clinical complete response (cCR), 11 partial response (PR), 12 no change (NC) after the FEC therapy, while 1 patient showed CR, 18 PR, 5 NC after ET therapy. There was no pathologic complete response or progressive disease, though a higher proportion of RR was observed in stage II than stage III patients in these two groups. Clinically palpable axillary lymph nodes which had been found in all 48 patients before 2 cycles of treatment, 50.0% (12/24) in the FEC patients and 66.7% (16/24) in the ET patients became in-palpable. The major toxicity, including leukopenia, gastroenteric reactions, were similar in both groups, but alopecia was more severe and arthralgia, myalgia, neurotoxicity and flushing of face were the unique features of the ET regimen.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two different regimens were effective to the primary tumor and axillary metastatic lymph nodes of breast cancer, and the side effects were tolerable. Higher efficacy and more side effects are observed in ET than in FEC regimen.
比较两种不同方案作为乳腺癌新辅助化疗的疗效和毒性。
48例经细胞学活检证实为Ⅱ、Ⅲ期乳腺癌的患者,每3 - 4周接受5-氟尿嘧啶、表柔比星、环磷酰胺(FEC)或表柔比星、紫杉醇(ET)方案化疗2个周期。新辅助化疗2个周期后评估乳腺和淋巴结的临床反应。FEC组患者在第1天和第8天接受5-氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu)500 mg/m² 持续4小时静脉滴注,第1天接受表柔比星(EPI)50 mg/m² 静脉注射,第1天和第8天接受环磷酰胺(CTX)500 mg/m² 静脉注射。分配到ET组的患者在第1天接受EPI 60 mg/m² 静脉注射,在第2天接受紫杉醇(TAX)150 mg/m² 持续3小时静脉滴注。所有患者2周后接受手术治疗,部分患者加行放疗。
对于乳腺原发性肿瘤,FEC组的总缓解率(RR)为50.0%(12/24),ET组为79.2%(19/24)。FEC治疗后1例患者出现临床完全缓解(cCR),11例部分缓解(PR),12例无变化(NC),而ET治疗后1例患者出现CR,18例PR,5例NC。两组均未出现病理完全缓解或疾病进展,尽管这两组中Ⅱ期患者的RR比例高于Ⅲ期患者。在48例患者治疗前2个周期均发现可触及的腋窝淋巴结,FEC组患者中有50.0%(12/24)、ET组患者中有66.7%(16/24)的腋窝淋巴结变得不可触及。两组的主要毒性,包括白细胞减少、胃肠道反应相似,但脱发更严重,关节痛、肌痛、神经毒性和面部潮红是ET方案的独特特征。
两种不同方案的新辅助化疗对乳腺癌原发性肿瘤和腋窝转移性淋巴结均有效,且副作用可耐受。ET方案比FEC方案疗效更高,但副作用更多。