[Comparative study of chemosensitivity and efficacy between pirarubicin and epirubicin in breast cancer].

OBJECTIVE

To compare the chemosensitivity of pirarubicin (THP) and epirubicin (EPI) in primary breast cancer (PBC) cells so as to examine their differential chemosensitivity to THP and EPI by CD-DST (collagen gel droplet embedded culture-drug sensitivity test) system; To detect the differences in the short-term clinical efficacy and side effects between TAC (docetaxel + pirarubicin + cyclophosphamide) and TEC (docetaxel + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide) as the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and the long-term clinical efficacy of CAF (cyclophosphamide + pirarubicin + fluorouracil) and CEF (cyclophosphamide + epirubicin + fluorouracil) as the chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer; To evaluate the feasibility of THP as an adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen in the treatment of breast cancer.

METHODS

From January 2008 to January 2009, a total of 129 fresh breast cancer samples were collected. The differential chemosensitivity of cultured PBC cells to THP and EPI was measured by CD-DST test. And 139 cases of PBC patients inIIb-IIIc phase were randomly divided into two groups: TAC and TEC groups. After 4-6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the primary lesion, axillary lymph nodes and side effects were assessed; The clinical data and survival status of 1241 cases of PBC patients treated at our hospital from 2003 to 2006 were collected and divided into CAF and CEF groups according to their chemotherapeutic regimens. Long-term prognosis was compared between two groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference of chemosensitivity between THP and EPI in PBC cells (P = 0.743); The overall response rate (RR) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 87.8%; the clinical objective responses, pathologic complete remission (pCR), clinical complete remission (cCR), clinical partial remission (cPR) and stable disease (SD) of groups TAC and TEC were 88.7%, 11.3%, 28.2%, 60.6%, 11.3% vs 86.8%, 10.3%, 26.5%, 60.3%, 13.2% respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). No significant differences existed between two groups in such side effects as leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, constipation, cardiotoxity and hepatorenal dysfunction (P > 0.05). The gastrointestinal reactions of nausea and vomiting was less frequent in the TAC group than that in the TEC group (46.5% vs 66.2%, P = 0.019); There was no significant difference in 5-year disease-free survival rate (79% vs 78%) and overall survival rate between two groups (85% vs 82%, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in chemosensitivity, clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, side effects or long-term efficacy between THP and EPI. Both pirarubicin and epirubicin may be used as conventional chemotherapy in breast cancer.