• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Genetic technologies, health care policy and the patent bargain.

作者信息

Caulfield T A, Knoppers B M, Gold E R, Sheremeta L E, Bridge P J

机构信息

Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Genet. 2003 Jan;63(1):15-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.630103.x.

DOI:10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.630103.x
PMID:12519367
Abstract

The idea of granting patents on human genetic material continues to cause controversy. The debate is largely focussed on the moral acceptability of human gene patents, the impact of gene patents on the research environment and the value of patents to stimulate innovation and the commercialization and dissemination of genetic discoveries. As highlighted by a recent controversy in Canada, patents can also have a profound effect on health policy and access to genetic services. Creative and bold patent reform initiatives are necessary to ensure that society will, to the highest degree possible, reap the health care benefits of the genetic revolution.

摘要

相似文献

1
Genetic technologies, health care policy and the patent bargain.
Clin Genet. 2003 Jan;63(1):15-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.630103.x.
2
The gene patent controversy on Twitter: a case study of Twitter users' responses to the CHEO lawsuit against Long QT gene patents.推特上的基因专利争议:推特用户对 CHEO 起诉长 QT 基因专利案回应的案例研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Aug 25;16:55. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0049-1.
3
Nutrigenomics patents and commercialization: old wine in a new bottle?营养基因组学专利与商业化:新瓶装旧酒?
OMICS. 2009 Feb;13(1):63-7. doi: 10.1089/omi.2008.0048.
4
Harvard v. Canada: the myc mouse that still squeaks in the maze of biopatent law.哈佛诉加拿大:在生物专利法迷宫中仍吱吱作响的“myc”小鼠。
Acad Med. 2001 Jul;76(7):684-92. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200107000-00007.
5
Patenting of genetic material: are the benefits to society being realized?遗传物质的专利申请:对社会的益处是否正在实现?
CMAJ. 2002 Aug 6;167(3):259-62.
6
Genes and patent policy: rethinking intellectual property rights.基因与专利政策:对知识产权的重新思考
Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Oct;3(10):803-8. doi: 10.1038/nrg909.
7
Patenting human genes: Chinese academic articles' portrayal of gene patents.人类基因专利:中国学术文章对基因专利的描述
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0271-8.
8
Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law.先申请专利,后提出问题:专利法中的道德与生物技术
William Mary Law Rev. 2003 Dec;45(2):469-547.
9
Do patents impede the provision of genetic tests in Australia?专利是否阻碍了澳大利亚基因检测服务的提供?
Aust Health Rev. 2013 Jun;37(3):281-5. doi: 10.1071/AH13029.
10
Locating gene patents within the patent system.在专利体系中查找基因专利。
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Summer;2(3):18-9. doi: 10.1162/152651602760250011.

引用本文的文献

1
The gene patent controversy on Twitter: a case study of Twitter users' responses to the CHEO lawsuit against Long QT gene patents.推特上的基因专利争议:推特用户对 CHEO 起诉长 QT 基因专利案回应的案例研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Aug 25;16:55. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0049-1.
2
Community leaders' perspectives on engaging African Americans in biobanks and other human genetics initiatives.社区领袖对让非裔美国人参与生物样本库及其他人类遗传学倡议的看法。
J Community Genet. 2013 Oct;4(4):483-94. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0155-z. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
3
Health care policy issues as a result of the genetic revolution: implications for public health.
基因革命引发的医疗保健政策问题:对公共卫生的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2005 Mar;95(3):385-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.026708.
4
Genetics and public health--evolution, or revolution?遗传学与公共卫生——进化,还是革命?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Nov;58(11):894-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.018515.