• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替尼泊苷和顺铂与依托泊苷和顺铂治疗小细胞肺癌的比较

[Teniposide and cisplatin compared with etoposide and cisplatin for treatment of small cell lung cancer].

作者信息

Fan Yun, Huang Zhi-yu, Zhang Yi-ping, Sun Lin

机构信息

Department of Chemotherapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, P. R. China.

出版信息

Ai Zheng. 2002 Dec;21(12):1368-71.

PMID:12520751
Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: EP regimen[etoposide (VP-16) + cisplatin (DDP)] is a standard regimen for treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but the cure rate is still low. Teniposide (VM-26) is highly active single agent for SCLC as VP-16, and penetratable through blood-brain barrier. This clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of teniposide plus cisplatin (VM-26 + DDP) regimen and EP regimen in treatment of SCLC, and the possible role of VM-26 on prevention of brain metastasis of SCLC.

METHODS

A total of 70 previously untreated SCLC patients without brain metastasis were included; 34 patients received VM-26 + DDP and 36 patients received EP. The characteristics of patients were comparable according to chi 2 test.

RESULTS

The overall response rate-was 76.5% for VM-26 + DDP group with 12 complete response (CR) and 14 partial response (PR), and 69.4% in the EP group with 12 CR and 13 PR (P = 0.595). The median duration of survival was 10.4 months for VM-26 + DDP group versus 9.8 months for EP group (P > 0.05). The 1, 2, and 5-year survival rates were 35.3%, 14.7%, 8.8% in the VM-26 + DDP group; and 38.9%, 13.9%, 8.3% in the EP group (P > 0.05, without statistical difference). The rate of brain metastasis was 5.9% for VM-26 + DDP group and 19.4% for EP group (P = 0.027, with statistical difference). The main toxicity was mylosuppression (I-II); there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

VM-26 + DDP is a highly active regimen for treatment of SCLC; there is no difference in the effectiveness and toxicity versus EP regimen; VM-26 is possibly effective in prevention of brain metastasis in SCLC patients.

摘要

背景与目的

EP方案(依托泊苷(VP - 16)+顺铂(DDP))是治疗小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的标准方案,但治愈率仍较低。替尼泊苷(VM - 26)作为一种对SCLC有高度活性的单药,其活性与VP - 16相当,且能穿透血脑屏障。本临床试验旨在比较替尼泊苷联合顺铂(VM - 26 + DDP)方案与EP方案治疗SCLC的疗效和毒性,以及VM - 26在预防SCLC脑转移方面的可能作用。

方法

共纳入70例既往未接受过治疗且无脑转移的SCLC患者;34例患者接受VM - 26 + DDP方案治疗,36例患者接受EP方案治疗。根据卡方检验,两组患者的特征具有可比性。

结果

VM - 26 + DDP组的总缓解率为76.5%,其中完全缓解(CR)12例,部分缓解(PR)14例;EP组的总缓解率为69.4%,其中CR 12例,PR 13例(P = 0.595)。VM - 26 + DDP组的中位生存期为10.4个月,EP组为9.8个月(P > 0.05)。VM - 26 + DDP组的1年、2年和5年生存率分别为35.3%、14.7%、8.8%;EP组分别为38.9%、13.9%、8.3%(P > 0.05,无统计学差异)。VM - 26 + DDP组的脑转移率为5.9%,EP组为19.4%(P = 0.027,有统计学差异)。主要毒性为骨髓抑制(I - II级);两组之间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

VM - 26 + DDP是治疗SCLC的高效方案;与EP方案相比,在有效性和毒性方面无差异;VM - 26可能对预防SCLC患者的脑转移有效。

相似文献

1
[Teniposide and cisplatin compared with etoposide and cisplatin for treatment of small cell lung cancer].替尼泊苷和顺铂与依托泊苷和顺铂治疗小细胞肺癌的比较
Ai Zheng. 2002 Dec;21(12):1368-71.
2
[VP-16 and VM-26 plus platinum drugs combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of small cell lung cancer].
Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 1998;23(6):587-9.
3
Second-line chemotherapy in recurrent small cell lung cancer. Results from a crossover schedule after primary treatment with cisplatin and etoposide (EP-regimen) or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and vincristin (CEV-regimen).复发性小细胞肺癌的二线化疗。顺铂和依托泊苷(EP方案)或环磷酰胺、表柔比星和长春新碱(CEV方案)一线治疗后交叉方案的结果。
Lung Cancer. 2005 May;48(2):251-61. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.10.016. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
4
[Sequential treatment of VmP regimen and whole brain radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases].[VmP方案序贯治疗联合全脑放疗用于小细胞肺癌脑转移患者]
Ai Zheng. 2004 Dec;23(12):1671-6.
5
Cisplatin plus etoposide chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation and paclitaxel plus cisplatin consolidation therapy for patients with limited stage small cell lung carcinoma.对于局限期小细胞肺癌患者,采用顺铂加依托泊苷化疗,随后进行胸部放疗,以及紫杉醇加顺铂巩固治疗。
Lung Cancer. 2006 Jul;53(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 May 23.
6
Alternating chemotherapy with etoposide plus cisplatin and topotecan plus paclitaxel in patients with untreated, extensive-stage small cell lung carcinoma: a phase II trial of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group.依托泊苷联合顺铂与拓扑替康联合紫杉醇交替化疗用于初治广泛期小细胞肺癌患者:北中部癌症治疗组的一项II期试验
Cancer. 2003 May 15;97(10):2498-503. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11377.
7
A randomised phase II study of the efficacy and safety of intravenous topotecan in combination with either cisplatin or etoposide in patients with untreated extensive disease small-cell lung cancer.一项关于静脉注射拓扑替康联合顺铂或依托泊苷治疗未经治疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的疗效和安全性的随机II期研究。
Lung Cancer. 2005 Aug;49(2):253-61. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.02.008.
8
Cisplatin and etoposide alternating ifosfamide, vincristine, epirubicin in small cell lung cancer.顺铂和依托泊苷交替联合异环磷酰胺、长春新碱、表柔比星治疗小细胞肺癌。
Saudi Med J. 2003 Jun;24(6):628-31.
9
Study of paclitaxel, etoposide, and cisplatin chemotherapy combined with twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9609 phase II study.紫杉醇、依托泊苷和顺铂化疗联合每日两次胸部放疗治疗局限期小细胞肺癌患者的研究:放射肿瘤学组9609 II期研究
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):4991-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.414. Epub 2005 Jun 6.
10
Is there a case for cisplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis of randomized trials of a cisplatin-containing regimen versus a regimen without this alkylating agent.顺铂用于治疗小细胞肺癌是否有依据?含顺铂方案与不含这种烷化剂方案的随机试验的荟萃分析。
Br J Cancer. 2000 Jul;83(1):8-15. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1164.