Duytschaever Mattias, Danse Peter, Eysbouts Sabine, Allessie Maurits
Department of Physiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Dec;13(12):1264-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.01264.x.
Atrial pacing can reduce the number of recurrences of atrial fibrillation (AF). It is unclear the extent to which this effect is determined by the site(s) of pacing.
In six electrically remodeled goats (24-hour AF), the window of inducibility of AF was determined by applying premature stimuli (S1-S2) at the right (RA) or left (LA) atrium (baseline values). Determination of the window of inducibility of AF at RA and LA was repeated during preventive pacing at four sites: RA, LA, Bachmann's bundle (BB), and RA+LA (biatrial). Mapping was used to elucidate the mechanisms of prevention of AF. At baseline, the window of inducibility of AF was 49 +/- 9 msec at RA and 45 +/- 17 msec at LA. Initiation of AF was associated with conduction block of the premature beat at BB. Preventive pacing at BB markedly shortened the window of inducibility of AF at RA (25 +/- 11 msec) and LA (17 +/- 8 msec, P < 0.01). Pacing at RA only shortened the window of inducibility of AF at LA (23 +/- 9 msec, P < 0.01), whereas pacing at LA only shortened the window of inducibility of AF at RA (23 +/- 11 msec, P < 0.01). Biatrial pacing failed to shorten the window of inducibility of AF both at RA and LA. Prevention of AF by pacing was due to prolongation of the premature interval at BB.
In the caprine model of AF, BB is a critical area of conduction of premature beats and initiation of AF. Pacing at BB can prevent but not completely abolish the initiation of AF by single premature beats (shortening of the window of inducibility). Prevention of AF by pacing is based on prolongation of the premature interval at BB, thus preventing conduction block and reentry. In general, the optimal site for preventive pacing is close to the area of block and remote from the origin of premature beats.
心房起搏可减少心房颤动(AF)的复发次数。目前尚不清楚这种效果在多大程度上由起搏部位决定。
在六只电重构山羊(持续性房颤24小时)中,通过在右心房(RA)或左心房(LA)施加期前刺激(S1-S2)来确定房颤的诱发窗口(基线值)。在四个部位进行预防性起搏期间,重复测定RA和LA处房颤的诱发窗口:RA、LA、巴赫曼束(BB)以及RA+LA(双心房)。通过标测来阐明预防房颤的机制。基线时,RA处房颤的诱发窗口为49±9毫秒,LA处为45±17毫秒。房颤的起始与BB处期前搏动的传导阻滞有关。在BB处进行预防性起搏显著缩短了RA处房颤的诱发窗口(25±11毫秒)和LA处的诱发窗口(17±8毫秒,P<0.01)。仅在RA起搏仅缩短了LA处房颤的诱发窗口(23±9毫秒,P<0.01),而仅在LA起搏仅缩短了RA处房颤的诱发窗口(23±11毫秒,P<0.01)。双心房起搏未能缩短RA和LA处房颤的诱发窗口。起搏预防房颤是由于BB处期前间期延长。
在山羊房颤模型中,BB是期前搏动传导和房颤起始的关键区域。在BB处起搏可预防但不能完全消除单个期前搏动引发的房颤(缩短诱发窗口)。起搏预防房颤基于BB处期前间期延长,从而防止传导阻滞和折返。一般来说,预防性起搏的最佳部位靠近阻滞区域且远离期前搏动的起源。