Prakash A, Delfaut P, Krol R B, Saksena S
Arrhythmia & Pacemaker Service, Eastern Heart Institute, Passaic, New Jersey, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Nov 15;82(10):1197-204. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00604-3.
We examined the activation of the right atrium and left atrium by pacing from different atrial sites using several single- and dual-site atrial pacing modes in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter. We also analyzed the effect of these pacing modes on fixed coupled extrastimuli in this population. Patients underwent detailed mapping of regional right atrial (RA) and left atrial (LA) sites. Bipolar pacing was performed individually from the high right atrium, coronary sinus ostium, and the distal coronary sinus, and simultaneously from the high right atrium and coronary sinus ostium (dual-site RA pacing) or high right atrium and distal coronary sinus (biatrial pacing). Extrastimuli were delivered from the high right atrium at fixed coupling intervals of 350 and 250 ms. Twenty patients with atrial fibrillation were studied. P-wave duration during pacing was significantly abbreviated by both dual-site RA and biatrial pacing (p <0.001 vs high RA pacing, respectively) but not by any other single-site atrial pacing method. Both dual-site atrial pacing modes also significantly abbreviated P wave durations for closely coupled high RA premature beats (p <0.001) in contrast to high RA pacing. During the basic pacing drive and for high RA extrastimuli, RA activation at the crista terminalis and atrial septum was comparable in sinus rhythm, high RA pacing, and in both dual-site atrial pacing methods, but was significantly delayed by coronary sinus ostial and distal coronary sinus pacing. In contrast, proximal coronary sinus activation was delayed with high RA pacing compared with all other pacing modes, and high RA extrastimuli encountered reduced conduction delay at this location with dual-site atrial pacing modes. LA activation was advanced superiorly by both single-site coronary sinus pacing methods and both dual-site atrial pacing techniques. Inferior and lateral LA activation was advanced by all pacing modes using a coronary sinus pacing site. However, earlier activation of LA sites occurred for high RA premature beats after both dual-site pacing methods (p <0.05) compared with single-site pacing modes. Incremental conduction delay at different atrial regions for closely coupled high RA extrastimuli ranged from 33% to 120% during high RA pacing and was significantly attenuated at multiple RA and LA sites by dual-site RA and biatrial pacing. Distinct global, as well as regional electrophysiologic effects, may mediate the variable antiarrhythmic effects of different and novel atrial pacing methods.
我们使用多种单部位和双部位心房起搏模式,通过在不同心房部位起搏,研究了心房颤动或心房扑动患者右心房和左心房的激活情况。我们还分析了这些起搏模式对该人群中固定耦合期外刺激的影响。患者接受了右心房(RA)和左心房(LA)区域的详细标测。分别从高位右心房、冠状窦口和冠状窦远端进行双极起搏,并同时从高位右心房和冠状窦口(双部位RA起搏)或高位右心房和冠状窦远端(双心房起搏)进行起搏。期外刺激以350和250毫秒的固定耦合间期从高位右心房发放。对20例心房颤动患者进行了研究。双部位RA起搏和双心房起搏均使起搏期间的P波时限显著缩短(分别与高位RA起搏相比,p<0.001),但其他任何单部位心房起搏方法均未使其缩短。与高位RA起搏相比,两种双部位心房起搏模式也显著缩短了紧密耦合的高位RA早搏的P波时限(p<0.001)。在基础起搏驱动期间以及对于高位RA期外刺激,窦性心律、高位RA起搏以及两种双部位心房起搏方法下,终末嵴和房间隔处的RA激活情况相当,但冠状窦口起搏和冠状窦远端起搏使其显著延迟。相比之下,与所有其他起搏模式相比,高位RA起搏时近端冠状窦激活延迟,且在双部位心房起搏模式下,高位RA期外刺激在该部位遇到的传导延迟减小。单部位冠状窦起搏方法和两种双部位心房起搏技术均使LA激活在上方提前。使用冠状窦起搏部位的所有起搏模式均使LA的下壁和侧壁激活提前。然而,与单部位起搏模式相比,两种双部位起搏方法后高位RA早搏的LA部位激活更早(p<0.05)。在高位RA起搏期间,紧密耦合的高位RA期外刺激在不同心房区域的传导延迟增量范围为33%至120%,双部位RA起搏和双心房起搏在多个RA和LA部位使其显著减轻。不同的新型心房起搏方法具有不同的抗心律失常作用,可能是由独特的整体以及局部电生理效应介导的。