Suppr超能文献

诱发脑电位测听法与听阈

Evoked cerebral potential audiometry and hearing threshold.

作者信息

Prevec T S, Cernelc S, Ribaric K

出版信息

Audiology. 1976 Jan-Feb;15(1):39-49. doi: 10.3109/00206097609071762.

Abstract

Audiometric testing by means of the nonspecific evoked cerebral potential (NECP) was performed in 20 children (11 with normal hearing, 6 with conductive and 3 with sensorineural hearing loss). The threshold as determined by this method was 20-30 dB higher than the threshold of the subjective tonal audiograms in the majority of the cases. Only in two cases the difference was up to 70 dB. There were no significant differences between the results of the methods in the three groups of children. The possible reasons for the described discrepancy between the thresholds of the ECP audiometry and the subjective tonal audiometry are discussed. It is pointed out that either of the two methods explores one of two different functional systems: the nonspecific activating system of the brain stem and the auditory pathway. It is suggested that the observed discrepancy between the results of the two methods may mainly be due to different thresholds of the two systems. To avoid false negative results of the ECP audiometry in subjects with 'constitutionally' low amplitude of the NECP it is proposed to routinely determine the amplitude of the NECP produced by somatosensory stimuli. Careful evaluation of the recorded data can improve the diagnostic value of ECP audiometry.

摘要

采用非特异性诱发脑电位(NECP)对20名儿童进行了听力测试(11名听力正常,6名传导性听力损失,3名感音神经性听力损失)。在大多数情况下,通过这种方法确定的阈值比主观纯音听力图的阈值高20 - 30分贝。只有两例差异高达70分贝。三组儿童中两种方法的结果之间没有显著差异。讨论了ECP听力测定法和主观纯音听力测定法阈值之间所述差异的可能原因。指出两种方法中的任何一种都探索了两种不同功能系统之一:脑干的非特异性激活系统和听觉通路。建议两种方法结果之间观察到的差异可能主要是由于两个系统的不同阈值。为避免在“体质性”NECP振幅较低的受试者中出现ECP听力测定法的假阴性结果,建议常规测定体感刺激产生的NECP振幅。对记录数据的仔细评估可以提高ECP听力测定法的诊断价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验