Andreatti Filho Raphael Lucio, Marcos Sampaio Homero, Rodrigues Barros Mércia, Roberto Gratão Paulo, Cataneo Angelo
Department of Veterinary Clinical, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechny, Universidade Estadual Paulista, CEP 18618-000, São Paulo, Botucatu, Brazil.
Vet Microbiol. 2003 Apr 2;92(3):237-44. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00366-8.
One-day-old broiler chicks received cecal microflora (CM) cultured under aerobic, anaerobic conditions, or both (mixed) and were then infected with Salmonella Enteritidis, in order to compare the efficacy of these different types of culture in terms of the number of chicks infected, cecal colonization and faecal excretion of the challenging bacteria. Regardless of culture type, CM always led to a smaller number of S. Enteritidis for any of the parameters studied compared to untreated chicks. Aerobic CM demonstrated better efficacy in reducing the number of infected chicks and cecal colonization by S. Enteritidis, followed by mixed CM. No difference was observed in faecal excretion of S. Enteritidis between the chicks that received different types of CM culture.
一日龄的肉鸡雏鸡接受了在需氧、厌氧条件下培养的盲肠微生物群(CM),或两者(混合)培养,然后感染肠炎沙门氏菌,以比较这些不同培养类型在感染雏鸡数量、盲肠定植和挑战细菌的粪便排泄方面的效果。无论培养类型如何,与未处理的雏鸡相比,CM在任何研究参数上导致的肠炎沙门氏菌数量总是较少。需氧CM在减少感染雏鸡数量和肠炎沙门氏菌的盲肠定植方面表现出更好的效果,其次是混合CM。接受不同类型CM培养的雏鸡在肠炎沙门氏菌的粪便排泄方面未观察到差异。