• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科和家庭医生办公室对非创伤性疾病的初级护理。

Primary care for nontraumatic illness at the emergency department and the family physician's office.

作者信息

Lees R E, Steele R, Spasoff R A

出版信息

Can Med Assoc J. 1976 Feb 21;114(4):333-7.

PMID:1253071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1956965/
Abstract

A total of 1117 visits by patients to two hospital emergency departments and 15 family physicians' offices for nontraumatic complaints over two 2-week periods were studied. Patients visiting the two settings fell into two distinct subgroups, and they appeared to select where to seek care by the acuteness and duration of the complaint. Several highly significant differences were noted between the two groups: those who visited an emergency department had complaints of shorter duration, underwent more investigations (which more often gave abnormal results), were more likely to undergo investigation for mental symptoms, had more consultations, received counselling and drug therapy less often (but intramuscular injections more often), were admitted to hospital more often, returned for further care for the same complaint less often, complied with disposal instructions less often, were more likely to receive fewer than 5 days' care and were less likely to receive more than 31 days' care; those without a family physician more often received additional care (were referred, admitted or asked to return).

摘要

在两个为期2周的时间段内,对患者前往两家医院急诊科和15位家庭医生办公室就诊的1117次非创伤性投诉进行了研究。在这两种场所就诊的患者分为两个不同的亚组,他们似乎根据投诉的急性程度和持续时间来选择就医地点。两组之间存在几个高度显著的差异:前往急诊科就诊的患者投诉持续时间较短,接受的检查更多(检查结果异常的情况更常见),更有可能接受精神症状方面的检查,会诊更多,接受咨询和药物治疗的频率较低(但接受肌肉注射的频率较高),住院的可能性更大,因同一投诉返回接受进一步治疗的可能性较小,遵守处置指示的可能性较小,接受少于5天治疗的可能性更大,接受超过31天治疗的可能性更小;没有家庭医生的患者更常接受额外治疗(被转诊、住院或被要求返回)。

相似文献

1
Primary care for nontraumatic illness at the emergency department and the family physician's office.急诊科和家庭医生办公室对非创伤性疾病的初级护理。
Can Med Assoc J. 1976 Feb 21;114(4):333-7.
2
Cost of primary health care services in the emergency department and the family physician's office.急诊科和家庭医生办公室的初级医疗保健服务成本。
Can Med Assoc J. 1975 May 3;112(9):1096-8, 1113.
3
Frequent users of emergency departments. Do they also use family physicians' services?急诊科的频繁使用者。他们也使用家庭医生的服务吗?
Can Fam Physician. 2002 Oct;48:1654-60.
4
Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 1999--2000.1999 - 2000年美国门诊病人到医生办公室、医院门诊部和急诊科的就诊情况。
Vital Health Stat 13. 2004 Sep(157):1-70.
5
Quality of care in hospital emergency departments and family physicians' offices.医院急诊科和家庭医生诊所的医疗质量。
Can Med Assoc J. 1977 Aug 6;117(3):229-32.
6
Rural/urban differences in health care utilization and place of death for persons with respiratory illness in the last year of life.生命最后一年中呼吸系统疾病患者在医疗保健利用和死亡地点方面的城乡差异。
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Apr-Jun;10(2):1349. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
7
Routine emergency department use for sick care by children in the United States.美国儿童在急诊科进行常规疾病护理的情况。
Pediatrics. 1996 Jul;98(1):28-34.
8
Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 2001-02.2001 - 2002年美国门诊就诊情况:内科医生诊所、医院门诊部及急诊科就诊情况
Vital Health Stat 13. 2006 Feb(159):1-66.
9
Effect of primary care referral on emergency department use: evaluation of a statewide Medicaid program.初级保健转诊对急诊科使用情况的影响:一项全州范围医疗补助计划的评估
Fam Med. 1996 Mar;28(3):178-82.
10
Analysis of costs, length of stay, and utilization of emergency department services by frequent users: implications for health policy.频繁使用者的成本、住院时间及急诊科服务利用情况分析:对卫生政策的启示
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1311-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.07.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments.在医院急诊科提供非紧急护理的基层医疗专业人员。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 13;2(2):CD002097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002097.pub4.
2
Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments.在医院急诊科提供非紧急护理的初级保健专业人员。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD002097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002097.pub3.
3
Which family practice patients visit the emergency department?哪些家庭实践患者会去急诊部就诊?
Can Fam Physician. 1982 Apr;28:679-84.
4
Secondary Emergency Visits: Patients seeking care for problems recently managed elsewhere.复诊:患者因近期在其他地方接受治疗的问题寻求医疗服务。
Can Fam Physician. 1991 Mar;37:614-9.
5
Patients seeking care during acute illness. Why do they not see their regular physicians?急性病患者寻求医疗护理。他们为什么不去看自己的常规医生呢?
Can Fam Physician. 2003 Nov;49:1498-503.
6
Case-mix differences between hospital outpatient departments and private practice.医院门诊部与私人诊所之间的病例组合差异。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1982 Sep;4(1):89-98.
7
Paediatric primary care in inner London.伦敦市中心的儿科初级保健。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 Sep;30(218):520-8.
8
Effects of hospital-based primary care setting on internists' treatment of primary care episodes.基于医院的基层医疗环境对内科医生处理基层医疗事件的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1981 Winter;16(4):383-405.
9
Quality of care in hospital emergency departments and family physicians' offices.医院急诊科和家庭医生诊所的医疗质量。
Can Med Assoc J. 1977 Aug 6;117(3):229-32.

本文引用的文献

1
The new role of the hospital emergency department.医院急诊科的新角色。
Can Med Assoc J. 1972 Feb 5;106(3):249-56.
2
Patient morbidity and some patterns of family practice in southeastern Ontario.安大略省东南部患者的发病率及家庭医疗的一些模式。
Can Med Assoc J. 1975 Jul 26;113(2):123-6.
3
Cost of primary health care services in the emergency department and the family physician's office.急诊科和家庭医生办公室的初级医疗保健服务成本。
Can Med Assoc J. 1975 May 3;112(9):1096-8, 1113.