Suppr超能文献

美国儿童在急诊科进行常规疾病护理的情况。

Routine emergency department use for sick care by children in the United States.

作者信息

Halfon N, Newacheck P W, Wood D L, St Peter R F

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1996 Jul;98(1):28-34.

PMID:8668408
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of the emergency departments as a regular source of sick care has been increasing, despite the fact that it is costly and is often an inappropriate source of care. This study examines factors associated with routine use of emergency departments by using a national sample of US children.

METHODS

Data from the 1988 National Health Interview Survey on Child Health, a nationally representative sample of 17710 children younger than 18 years, was linked to country-level health resource data from the Area Resource File. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the association between children's use of emergency departments as their usual sources of sick care and predisposing need and enabling characteristics of the families, as well as availability of health resources in their communities.

RESULTS

In 1988 3.4% or approximately 2 million US children younger than 18 years were reported to use emergency departments as their usual sources of sick care. Significant demographic risk factors for reporting an emergency department as a usual source of sick care included black versus white race (odds ratio [OR], 2.08), single-parent versus two-parent families (OR, 1.53), mothers with less than a high school education versus those with high school or more (OR, 1.76), poor versus nonpoor families (OR, 1.76), and living in an urban versus suburban setting (OR, 1.38). Specific indicators of need, such as recurrent health conditions (asthma, tonsillitis, headaches, and febrile seizures), were not associated with routine use of emergency departments for sick care. Furthermore, health insurance status and specifically Medicaid coverage had no association with use of the emergency department as a usual source of sick care. Compared with children who receive well child care in private physicians' offices or health maintenance organizations, children whose sources of well child care were neighborhood health centers were more likely to report emergency departments for sick care (OR, 2.01). Children residing in counties where the supply of primary care physicians was in the top quintile had half the odds (OR, 0.50) of reporting emergency departments as usual sources of sick care.

CONCLUSIONS

Reliance on hospital emergency departments for routine sick care is strongly associated with demographic and social characteristics of the child and family, the type and source of available well child care, and the supply of primary care physicians. Because health insurance status was not a significant predictor of use, public policies aimed at reducing the use of emergency departments by children will need to address other factors. These include the organizational characteristics and responsiveness of the health care system and the motivation of families for routine use of hospital emergency departments.

摘要

背景

尽管使用急诊科作为常规的疾病护理来源成本高昂且常常并不适宜,但这种情况一直在增加。本研究通过对美国儿童的全国性样本进行分析,探讨与常规使用急诊科相关的因素。

方法

1988年全国儿童健康访谈调查的数据,该调查是对17710名18岁以下儿童的具有全国代表性的样本,与来自地区资源文件的县级卫生资源数据相链接。采用双变量和多变量分析来评估儿童将急诊科作为其常规疾病护理来源与家庭的易患需求、促成特征以及社区卫生资源可及性之间的关联。

结果

1988年,据报告有3.4%(约200万)的18岁以下美国儿童将急诊科作为其常规疾病护理来源。将急诊科报告为常规疾病护理来源的显著人口统计学风险因素包括黑人与白人种族(比值比[OR],2.08)、单亲家庭与双亲家庭(OR,1.53)、母亲受教育程度低于高中与受教育程度为高中或更高(OR,1.76)、贫困家庭与非贫困家庭(OR,1.76)以及居住在城市与郊区环境(OR,1.38)。特定的需求指标,如反复出现的健康状况(哮喘、扁桃体炎、头痛和热性惊厥),与常规使用急诊科进行疾病护理无关。此外,健康保险状况,特别是医疗补助覆盖情况,与将急诊科作为常规疾病护理来源的使用情况无关。与在私人医生办公室或健康维护组织接受儿童保健的儿童相比,其儿童保健来源为社区卫生中心的儿童更有可能将急诊科作为疾病护理场所(OR,2.01)。居住在初级保健医生供应处于最高五分位数的县的儿童,将急诊科报告为常规疾病护理来源的几率只有一半(OR,0.50)。

结论

依赖医院急诊科进行常规疾病护理与儿童及家庭的人口统计学和社会特征、可获得的儿童保健的类型和来源以及初级保健医生的供应密切相关。由于健康保险状况并非使用情况的显著预测因素,旨在减少儿童使用急诊科的公共政策将需要解决其他因素。这些因素包括医疗保健系统的组织特征和响应能力以及家庭常规使用医院急诊科的动机。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验