Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂联合治疗非糖尿病肾病(COOPERATE):一项随机对照试验。

Combination treatment of angiotensin-II receptor blocker and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor in non-diabetic renal disease (COOPERATE): a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Nakao Naoyuki, Yoshimura Ashio, Morita Hiroyuki, Takada Masyuki, Kayano Tsuguo, Ideura Terukuni

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Lancet. 2003 Jan 11;361(9352):117-24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12229-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Present angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor treatment fails to prevent progression of non-diabetic renal disease. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of combined treatment of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin-II receptor blocker, and monotherapy of each drug at its maximum dose, in patients with non-diabetic renal disease.

METHODS

336 patients with non-diabetic renal disease were enrolled from one renal outpatient department in Japan. After screening and an 18-week run-in period, 263 patients were randomly assigned angiotensin-II receptor blocker (losartan, 100 mg daily), angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (trandolapril, 3 mg daily), or a combination of both drugs at equivalent doses. Survival analysis was done to compare the effects of each regimen on the combined primary endpoint of time to doubling of serum creatinine concentration or end-stage renal disease. Analysis was by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Seven patients discontinued or were otherwise lost to follow-up. Ten (11%) of 85 patients on combination treatment reached the combined primary endpoint compared with 20 (23%) of 85 on trandolapril alone (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.63, p=0.018) and 20 (23%) of 86 on losartan alone (0.40, 0.17-0.69, p=0.016). Covariates affecting renal survival were combination treatment (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.63, p=0.011), age (1.30, 1.03-2.29, p=0.009), baseline renal function (1.80, 1.02-2.99, p=0.021), change in daily urinary protein excretion rate (0.58, 0.24-0.88, p=0.022), use of diuretics (0.80, 0.30-0.94, p=0.043), and antiproteinuric response to trandolapril (0.81, 0.21-0.91, p=0.039). Frequency of side-effects with combination treatment was the same as with trandolapril alone.

INTERPRETATION

Combination treatment safely retards progression of non-diabetic renal disease compared with monotherapy. However, since some patients reached the combined primary endpoint on combined treatment, further strategies for complete management of progressive non-diabetic renal disease need to be researched.

摘要

背景

目前的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗无法阻止非糖尿病肾病的进展。我们旨在评估血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂联合治疗以及每种药物最大剂量单药治疗对非糖尿病肾病患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

从日本一家肾脏门诊招募了336例非糖尿病肾病患者。经过筛选和18周的导入期后,263例患者被随机分配接受血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(氯沙坦,每日100毫克)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(群多普利,每日3毫克)或两种药物的等效剂量联合治疗。进行生存分析以比较每种治疗方案对血清肌酐浓度翻倍时间或终末期肾病这一联合主要终点的影响。分析采用意向性治疗。

结果

7例患者停药或失访。联合治疗组85例患者中有10例(11%)达到联合主要终点,而单独使用群多普利组85例中有20例(23%)(风险比0.38,95%可信区间0.18 - 0.63,p = 0.018),单独使用氯沙坦组86例中有20例(23%)(0.40,0.17 - 0.69,p = 0.016)。影响肾脏存活的协变量包括联合治疗(风险比0.38,95%可信区间0.18 - 0.63),p = 0.011)、年龄(1.30,1.03 - 2.29,p = 0.009)、基线肾功能(1.80,1.02 - 2.99,p = 0.021)、每日尿蛋白排泄率变化(0.58,0.24 - 0.88,p = 0.022)、利尿剂使用情况(0.80,0.30 - 0.94),p = 0.043)以及对群多普利的抗蛋白尿反应(0.81,0.21 - 0.91,p = 0.039)。联合治疗的副作用发生率与单独使用群多普利相同。

解读

与单药治疗相比,联合治疗可安全延缓非糖尿病肾病的进展。然而,由于一些患者在联合治疗时达到了联合主要终点,因此需要研究进一步全面管理进行性非糖尿病肾病的策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验