Gianelly Anthony A
Department of Orthodontics, Boston University School of Dental Medicine, USA.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jan;123(1):25-8. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.57.
An undocumented criticism of extraction treatment is that it results in narrower dental arches when compared with nonextraction therapy. Anterior and posterior arch widths of the maxillary and mandibular arches of 25 patients treated by 4 first-premolar extraction and 25 patients treated without extractions were measured on posttreatment study models and compared statistically to determine whether the dental arches were narrower after extraction treatment, to test the accuracy of this view. Measurements were made in the canine and the molar regions from the most labial aspect of the buccal surfaces of the canines and the molars. In both groups, anterior and posterior arch widths were the same except for the mandibular intercanine dimension, which was 0.94 mm larger (P <.01) in the extraction group. This indicates that extraction treatment does not result in narrower dental arches than nonextraction treatment.
对拔牙治疗的一种未记录在案的批评观点是,与不拔牙治疗相比,它会导致牙弓变窄。在治疗后的研究模型上,对25例接受四颗第一前磨牙拔除治疗的患者以及25例未拔牙治疗的患者的上颌和下颌牙弓的前后宽度进行了测量,并进行统计学比较,以确定拔牙治疗后牙弓是否变窄,从而检验这一观点的准确性。测量是在尖牙和磨牙区域,从尖牙和磨牙颊面最唇侧的方面进行的。在两组中,除了下颌尖牙间距离外,前后牙弓宽度相同,拔牙组的下颌尖牙间距离大0.94毫米(P<0.01)。这表明拔牙治疗不会导致牙弓比不拔牙治疗更窄。