• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形患者牙弓变化的比较:拔牙与不拔牙治疗

Comparisons of the dental arch changes in patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusions: extraction vs nonextraction treatments.

作者信息

Bishara S E, Bayati P, Zaher A R, Jakobsen J R

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 1994;64(5):351-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0351:COTDAC>2.0.CO;2.

DOI:10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0351:COTDAC>2.0.CO;2
PMID:7802329
Abstract

Treatment and posttreatment changes in the dental arches of patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusions were evaluated. Half the patients (N = 46) were treated with a nonextraction approach; treatment for the other half (N = 45) included the extraction of four first premolars. The following parameters were measured in the maxillary and mandibular arches: arch width at the incisors, canines, second premolars and first permanent molars; anterior, posterior and total arch lengths; and total and anterior tooth size-arch length discrepancies. These parameters were measured pretreatment, immediately following orthodontic treatment and at least 2 years posttreatment. The findings indicate that the extraction of premolars significantly improves the discrepancy between the tooth size and arch length during treatment. Posttreatment both the extraction and nonextraction groups experienced an increase in tooth size-arch length discrepancies and a reduction in arch length. Extractions did not significantly alter the direction of the overall posttreatment trends for some parameters, e.g., intercanine width and tooth size-arch length discrepancies. On the other hand, the posttreatment trends for other parameters--such as intermolar width--were significantly different between the extraction and nonextraction groups. In general, the trends in the posttreatment changes were similar in males and females as well as in the maxillary and mandibular arches.

摘要

对安氏II类1分类错牙合患者牙弓的治疗及治疗后变化进行了评估。一半患者(N = 46)采用非拔牙矫治方法;另一半患者(N = 45)的治疗包括拔除四颗第一前磨牙。在上颌和下颌牙弓中测量了以下参数:切牙、尖牙、第二前磨牙和第一恒磨牙处的牙弓宽度;前牙弓长度、后牙弓长度和总牙弓长度;以及牙齿总大小与牙弓长度的差异和前牙大小与牙弓长度的差异。这些参数在正畸治疗前、正畸治疗刚结束时以及治疗后至少2年进行测量。研究结果表明,在治疗过程中,拔除前磨牙显著改善了牙齿大小与牙弓长度之间的差异。治疗后,拔牙组和非拔牙组的牙齿大小与牙弓长度差异均增加,牙弓长度减小。拔牙并未显著改变某些参数(如尖牙间宽度和牙齿大小与牙弓长度差异)治疗后总体变化趋势的方向。另一方面,拔牙组和非拔牙组之间其他参数(如磨牙间宽度)的治疗后变化趋势存在显著差异。总体而言,治疗后变化趋势在男性和女性以及上颌和下颌牙弓中相似。

相似文献

1
Comparisons of the dental arch changes in patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusions: extraction vs nonextraction treatments.安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形患者牙弓变化的比较:拔牙与不拔牙治疗
Angle Orthod. 1994;64(5):351-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0351:COTDAC>2.0.CO;2.
2
Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment.安氏II类1分类错牙合患者拔牙与非拔牙治疗后的治疗及治疗后变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Jan;111(1):18-27. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70297-x.
3
Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline Class I malocclusion treated with extractions or without extractions with air-rotor stripping.采用拔牙或不拔牙配合气动去釉技术治疗安氏Ⅰ类边缘性错[牙合]患者的牙弓宽度和周长变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jun;137(6):734.e1-7; discussion 734-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.023.
4
Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment.拔牙与非拔牙正畸治疗中垂直面部及牙弓尺寸变化
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Jan;20(1):17-21.
5
Transverse implications of maxillary premolar extraction in Class III presurgical orthodontic treatment.Ⅲ类错颌术前正畸治疗中拔除上颌前磨牙的横向影响
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jun;129(6):740-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.002.
6
Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.安氏II类错牙合患者上颌第二磨牙拔除与不拔除治疗的头影测量比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Dec;120(6):608-13; quiz 677. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.119805.
7
Arch width after extraction and nonextraction treatment.拔牙与不拔牙治疗后的牙弓宽度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jan;123(1):25-8. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.57.
8
Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.I类患者拔牙矫治与非拔牙矫治中的牙弓宽度变化
Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):948-52. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[948:AWCIEA]2.0.CO;2.
9
Treatment stability in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with 2 maxillary premolar extractions or without extractions.上颌 2 颗前磨牙拔牙或不拔牙矫治Ⅱ类错[牙合]患者的治疗稳定性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jul;138(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.033.
10
Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.采用拔除两颗前磨牙和四颗前磨牙矫治方案治疗的安氏II类错牙合的咬合稳定性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Aug;130(2):189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.037.

引用本文的文献

1
Long term dental transversal stability of Class II division 1 treated with cervical headgear.头帽颏兜矫治安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错牙合的长期牙弓宽度稳定性
Dental Press J Orthod. 2022 Jun 10;27(2):e2220291. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.27.2.e2220291.oar. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of Tooth Widths, Arch Widths and Arch Lengths in Class-I Normal Dentition to Class-I and II Crowded Dentitions.I类正常牙列与I类和II类牙列拥挤患者的牙宽度、牙弓宽度和牙弓长度比较。
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):345-350. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.3240.
3
Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method.
采用拔除上颌第一前磨牙和不拔牙方法治疗的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者的牙弓宽度变化
J Clin Exp Dent. 2016 Oct 1;8(4):e403-e408. doi: 10.4317/jced.52840. eCollection 2016 Oct.
4
A comparison of second premolar extraction and mini-implant total arch distalization with interproximal stripping.第二前磨牙拔除与微型种植体支抗整体后移联合牙间去釉的比较
Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul;83(4):680-5. doi: 10.2319/091112-726.1. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
5
Facial divergence and mandibular crowding in treated subjects.治疗后患者的面型偏斜和下颌拥挤。
Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):381-8. doi: 10.2319/061912-505.1. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
6
Influence of facial growth pattern on outcome of extraction therapy.面部生长模式对拔牙治疗效果的影响。
J Orofac Orthop. 1997;58(3):154-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02676546.