• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I类患者拔牙矫治与非拔牙矫治中的牙弓宽度变化

Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.

作者信息

Aksu Muge, Kocadereli Ilken

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):948-52. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[948:AWCIEA]2.0.CO;2.

DOI:10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[948:AWCIEA]2.0.CO;2
PMID:16448236
Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to examine the dental arch width changes of extraction and nonextraction treatment in Class I patients. The study was performed on pretreatment and posttreatment dental casts of 60 patients (30 extraction and 30 nonextraction). The mean ages were 14.3 +/- 2.02 years for the extraction group and 14.1 +/- 2.9 years for the nonextraction group. The maxillary and mandibular crowding was -6.7 +/- 3.1 and -6.3 +/- 2.8 mm for the extraction group and -4.5 +/- 3.6 and -2.1 +/- 3.5 mm for the nonextraction group, respectively. The intercanine and intermolar arch width measurements were measured using a digital caliper. Paired samples t-test was used to evaluate the treatment changes within each group. To compare the changes between groups, independent samples t-test was performed. At the start of treatment, the maxillary and the mandibular intercanine and intermolar widths of both groups did not differ statistically. At the end of treatment, maxillary and mandibular intercanine widths of both groups increased significantly. The mandibular intermolar width decreased significantly for the extraction group and the maxillary intermolar width increased significantly for the nonextraction group. The decrease in maxillary intermolar width for the extraction group and the increase in mandibular intermolar width for the nonextraction group were not significantly different. No differences were observed between the groups in maxillary and mandibular intercanine widths. Maxillary and mandibular intermolar width indicated a significantly larger value in the nonextraction group than that in the extraction group.

摘要

这项回顾性研究的目的是检查Ⅰ类患者拔牙治疗和非拔牙治疗后的牙弓宽度变化。该研究对60例患者(30例拔牙患者和30例非拔牙患者)治疗前和治疗后的石膏模型进行。拔牙组的平均年龄为14.3±2.02岁,非拔牙组为14.1±2.9岁。拔牙组上颌和下颌拥挤度分别为-6.7±3.1和-6.3±2.8mm,非拔牙组分别为-4.5±3.6和-2.1±3.5mm。使用数字卡尺测量尖牙间和磨牙间牙弓宽度。采用配对样本t检验评估每组内的治疗变化。为比较组间变化,进行独立样本t检验。治疗开始时,两组的上颌和下颌尖牙间及磨牙间宽度在统计学上无差异。治疗结束时,两组的上颌和下颌尖牙间宽度均显著增加。拔牙组的下颌磨牙间宽度显著减小,非拔牙组的上颌磨牙间宽度显著增加。拔牙组上颌磨牙间宽度的减小和非拔牙组下颌磨牙间宽度的增加无显著差异。两组的上颌和下颌尖牙间宽度无差异。上颌和下颌磨牙间宽度显示非拔牙组的值显著大于拔牙组。

相似文献

1
Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.I类患者拔牙矫治与非拔牙矫治中的牙弓宽度变化
Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):948-52. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[948:AWCIEA]2.0.CO;2.
2
Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline Class I malocclusion treated with extractions or without extractions with air-rotor stripping.采用拔牙或不拔牙配合气动去釉技术治疗安氏Ⅰ类边缘性错[牙合]患者的牙弓宽度和周长变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jun;137(6):734.e1-7; discussion 734-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.023.
3
Extraction vs nonextraction: arch widths and smile esthetics.拔牙矫治与不拔牙矫治:牙弓宽度与微笑美学
Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):354-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0354:EVNAWA>2.0.CO;2.
4
Arch widths after extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.I类患者拔牙和非拔牙治疗后的牙弓宽度。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Mar 1;14(2):312-5. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1319.
5
Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.使用自锁托槽和传统托槽治疗牙列拥挤时下颌牙弓的变化。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Jun;32(3):248-53. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp123. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
6
Dental arch dimensions in oligodontia patients.少牙畸形患者的牙弓尺寸
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Dec;134(6):768-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.029.
7
Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 1: differences between premolar extraction and nonextraction treatment outcomes.上颌弓宽度和颊廊变化与正畸治疗相关。第 1 部分:磨牙拔除与不拔除治疗结果的差异。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Feb;145(2):207-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.017.
8
Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.拔牙与不拔牙治疗对安氏I类和II类患者的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2003 Feb;73(1):36-42. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0036:EOEANT>2.0.CO;2.
9
Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion, class II division 1 and class II division 2.正常咬合、安氏II类1分类和安氏II类2分类中的牙弓及牙槽弓宽度
Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):941-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[941:DAAAWI]2.0.CO;2.
10
Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions.早期混合牙列与恒牙列中Ⅱ类错牙合畸形的牙弓宽度和下颌-上颌基骨宽度
Angle Orthod. 2003 Dec;73(6):674-85. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0674:DAWAMB>2.0.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in the arch width and buccal corridor after fixed orthodontic treatment with Damon self-ligating system: premolar extraction vs. non-extraction.Damon 自锁托槽系统固定正畸治疗后牙弓宽度和颊廊的变化:拔牙与非拔牙。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Jul 8;29(3):e2423159. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.3.e2423159.oar. eCollection 2024.
2
A Comparative Analysis of Arch Widths in Class I and Class II Malocclusion: Extraction vs. Non-extraction Treatment.安氏Ⅰ类与Ⅱ类错牙合的牙弓宽度比较分析:拔牙矫治与非拔牙矫治
Cureus. 2024 Apr 10;16(4):e57982. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57982. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Extraction vs nonextraction orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
拔牙与不拔牙正畸治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Angle Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;94(1):83-106. doi: 10.2319/021123-98.1.
4
Scan Aided Dental Arch Width Prediction via Internationally Recognized Formulas and Indices in a Sample of Kurdish Population/Iraq.通过国际公认公式和指数对伊拉克库尔德人群样本进行扫描辅助牙弓宽度预测
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 29;13(11):1900. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111900.
5
Comparison of Tooth Widths, Arch Widths and Arch Lengths in Class-I Normal Dentition to Class-I and II Crowded Dentitions.I类正常牙列与I类和II类牙列拥挤患者的牙宽度、牙弓宽度和牙弓长度比较。
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):345-350. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.3240.
6
Nonextraction Management of Severely Malaligned and Constricted Upper Arch.严重牙列不齐且上颌弓狭窄的非拔牙矫治
Case Rep Dent. 2020 Aug 25;2020:8836061. doi: 10.1155/2020/8836061. eCollection 2020.
7
Changes in maximum lip-closing force after extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatments.拔牙和非拔牙正畸治疗后最大唇部闭合力的变化。
Korean J Orthod. 2020 Mar;50(2):120-128. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.2.120. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
8
Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes associated with miniscrew anchorage in customized lingual orthodontics.定制舌侧正畸中与微螺钉支抗相关的牙颌面及软组织变化。
J Int Med Res. 2019 Jan;47(1):84-95. doi: 10.1177/0300060518795541. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
9
Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method.采用拔除上颌第一前磨牙和不拔牙方法治疗的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者的牙弓宽度变化
J Clin Exp Dent. 2016 Oct 1;8(4):e403-e408. doi: 10.4317/jced.52840. eCollection 2016 Oct.
10
Interproximal wear versus incisors extraction to solve anterior lower crowding: a systematic review.邻面磨损与拔除切牙治疗下前牙拥挤的系统评价
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Jan-Feb;20(1):66-73. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.066-073.oar.