Felter Susan P, Robinson Michael K, Basketter David A, Gerberick G Frank
The Procter & Gamble Co., Miami Valley Laboratories, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Contact Dermatitis. 2002 Nov;47(5):257-66. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.470502.x.
Safety evaluations for chemicals which possess the ability to cause sensitization by skin contact have traditionally been done using an ad hoc comparative risk assessment technique. Recently, several papers have been published supporting the use of an alternative, and potentially better, quantitative risk assessment approach. While they represent a relatively new approach to risk assessment for sensitizers, quantitative methods have been used for decades to support risk assessments for systemic toxicity. Historically, these methods have involved the extrapolation of toxicity data - generally from studies in laboratory animals at relatively high doses to human exposures at lower doses. For toxicity endpoints with a threshold, this process has traditionally involved the use of uncertainty factors. For example, uncertainty factors are commonly used to extrapolate from laboratory animals to humans, and from 'average' humans to sensitive subpopulations. In the absence of data to support a different value, a default factor of 10 is widely accepted for each of these areas. Recent papers have advocated the use of a similar approach to characterize the risk of the induction of skin sensitization by allergens of varying potency and potential for skin contact. As with other forms of toxicity, a quantitative assessment of risk for allergic skin reactions can be approached by identifying a NOAEL (no observed adverse effect level) and applying appropriate uncertainty factors. Three major areas of data extrapolation have been identified: inter-individual susceptibility, the influence of vehicle or product matrix, and exposure considerations. This paper provides an overview of each of these areas with an evaluation of the available scientific database to support an uncertainty factor in the range of 1-10 for each area.
对于具有通过皮肤接触引起致敏能力的化学品,传统上使用临时比较风险评估技术进行安全性评估。最近,有几篇论文发表,支持使用另一种可能更好的定量风险评估方法。虽然它们代表了一种相对较新的致敏剂风险评估方法,但定量方法已经使用了几十年,以支持全身毒性的风险评估。从历史上看,这些方法涉及毒性数据的外推——通常是从相对高剂量的实验室动物研究到低剂量的人类暴露。对于有阈值的毒性终点,这个过程传统上涉及使用不确定性因素。例如,不确定性因素通常用于从实验室动物外推到人类,以及从“普通”人类外推到敏感亚群。在没有数据支持不同值的情况下,每个领域默认的10倍因子被广泛接受。最近的论文主张使用类似的方法来描述不同效力和皮肤接触可能性的过敏原引起皮肤致敏的风险。与其他毒性形式一样,过敏性皮肤反应的风险定量评估可以通过确定无观察到不良作用水平(NOAEL)并应用适当的不确定性因素来进行。已经确定了三个主要的数据外推领域:个体间易感性、载体或产品基质的影响以及暴露考虑因素。本文概述了每个领域,并评估了可用的科学数据库,以支持每个领域1-10范围内的不确定性因素。