O'Connor D, Marshall S, Massy-Westropp N
School of Occupational Therapy, University of South Australia, City East Campus, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD003219. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003219.
Non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome is frequently offered to those with mild to moderate symptoms. The effectiveness and duration of benefit from non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome remain unknown.
To evaluate the effectiveness of non-surgical treatment (other than steroid injection) for carpal tunnel syndrome versus a placebo or other non-surgical, control interventions in improving clinical outcome.
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group specialised register (searched March 2002), MEDLINE (searched January 1966 to February 7 2001), EMBASE (searched January 1980 to March 2002), CINAHL (searched January 1983 to December 2001), AMED (searched 1984 to January 2002), Current Contents (January 1993 to March 2002), PEDro and reference lists of articles.
Randomised or quasi-randomised studies in any language of participants with the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome who had not previously undergone surgical release. We considered all non-surgical treatments apart from local steroid injection. The primary outcome measure was improvement in clinical symptoms after at least three months following the end of treatment.
Three reviewers independently selected the trials to be included. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Studies were rated for their overall quality. Relative risks and weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the primary and secondary outcomes in each trial. Results of clinically and statistically homogeneous trials were pooled to provide estimates of the efficacy of non-surgical treatments.
Twenty-one trials involving 884 people were included. A hand brace significantly improved symptoms after four weeks (weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.29 to -0.85) and function (WMD -0.55; 95% CI -0.82 to -0.28). In an analysis of pooled data from two trials (63 participants) ultrasound treatment for two weeks was not significantly beneficial. However one trial showed significant symptom improvement after seven weeks of ultrasound (WMD -0.99; 95% CI -1.77 to - 0.21) which was maintained at six months (WMD -1.86; 95% CI -2.67 to -1.05). Four trials involving 193 people examined various oral medications (steroids, diuretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) versus placebo. Compared to placebo, pooled data for two-week oral steroid treatment demonstrated a significant improvement in symptoms (WMD -7.23; 95% CI -10.31 to -4.14). One trial also showed improvement after four weeks (WMD -10.8; 95% CI -15.26 to -6.34). Compared to placebo, diuretics or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs did not demonstrate significant benefit. In two trials involving 50 people, vitamin B6 did not significantly improve overall symptoms. In one trial involving 51 people yoga significantly reduced pain after eight weeks (WMD -1.40; 95% CI -2.73 to -0.07) compared with wrist splinting. In one trial involving 21 people carpal bone mobilisation significantly improved symptoms after three weeks (WMD -1.43; 95% CI -2.19 to -0.67) compared to no treatment. In one trial involving 50 people with diabetes, steroid and insulin injections significantly improved symptoms over eight weeks compared with steroid and placebo injections. Two trials involving 105 people compared ergonomic keyboards versus control and demonstrated equivocal results for pain and function. Trials of magnet therapy, laser acupuncture, exercise or chiropractic care did not demonstrate symptom benefit when compared to placebo or control.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence shows significant short-term benefit from oral steroids, splinting, ultrasound, yoga and carpal bone mobilisation. Other non-surgical treatments do not produce significant benefit. More trials are needed to compare treatments and ascertain the duration of benefit.
对于症状轻至中度的腕管综合征患者,常采用非手术治疗。非手术治疗腕管综合征的有效性及获益持续时间尚不清楚。
评估非手术治疗(不包括类固醇注射)与安慰剂或其他非手术对照干预措施相比,对改善腕管综合征临床结局的有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane神经肌肉疾病专业注册库(检索时间为2002年3月)、MEDLINE(检索时间为1966年1月至2001年2月7日)、EMBASE(检索时间为1980年1月至2002年3月)、CINAHL(检索时间为1983年1月至2001年12月)、AMED(检索时间为1984年至2002年1月)、《现刊目次》(1993年1月至2002年3月)、PEDro以及文章的参考文献列表。
对诊断为腕管综合征且此前未接受过手术松解的参与者进行的任何语言的随机或半随机研究。我们考虑了除局部类固醇注射以外的所有非手术治疗方法。主要结局指标为治疗结束后至少三个月临床症状的改善情况。
三位评价者独立选择纳入的试验。两位评价者独立提取数据。对研究的整体质量进行评分。计算每个试验主要和次要结局的相对风险及加权均数差,并给出95%置信区间。对临床和统计学上同质的试验结果进行汇总,以提供非手术治疗疗效的估计值。
纳入了21项试验,共884人。手部支具在四周后显著改善了症状(加权均数差(WMD)-1.07;95%置信区间(CI)-1.29至-0.85)和功能(WMD -0.55;95% CI -0.82至-0.28)。在对两项试验(63名参与者)的汇总数据分析中,两周的超声治疗并无显著益处。然而,一项试验显示超声治疗七周后症状有显著改善(WMD -0.99;95% CI -1.77至-0.21),且在六个月时仍保持(WMD -1.86;95% CI -2.67至-1.05)。四项试验(193人)比较了各种口服药物(类固醇、利尿剂、非甾体抗炎药)与安慰剂。与安慰剂相比,两周口服类固醇治疗的汇总数据显示症状有显著改善(WMD -7.23;95% CI -10.31至-4.14)。一项试验还显示四周后有改善(WMD -10.8;95% CI -15.26至-6.34)。与安慰剂相比,利尿剂或非甾体抗炎药未显示出显著益处。在两项试验(50人)中,维生素B6未显著改善总体症状。在一项试验(51人)中,与腕部夹板相比,瑜伽在八周后显著减轻了疼痛(WMD -1.40;95% CI -2.73至-0.07)。在一项试验(21人)中,与不治疗相比,腕骨松动术在三周后显著改善了症状(WMD -1.43;95% CI -2.19至-0.67)。在一项试验(50名糖尿病患者)中,与类固醇和安慰剂注射相比,类固醇和胰岛素注射在八周内显著改善了症状。两项试验(105人)比较了人体工程学键盘与对照组,在疼痛和功能方面结果不明确。与安慰剂或对照组相比,磁疗、激光针灸、运动或整脊疗法试验均未显示出症状改善。
目前的证据表明口服类固醇、夹板固定、超声、瑜伽和腕骨松动术有显著的短期益处。其他非手术治疗未产生显著益处。需要更多试验来比较各种治疗方法并确定获益持续时间。