Vibert E, Regimbeau J M, Panis Y, Lê P, Soyer P, Boudiaf M, Rymer R, Valleur P
Service de chirurgie hôpital Lariboisière, 2, rue Ambroise-Paré, 75475 Paris cedex 10, France.
Ann Chir. 2002 Dec;127(10):765-70. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3944(02)00880-5.
The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the impact of the routine use of abdominal spiral computed tomography (SCT) in patients with postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO) for whom initial conservative treatment was proposed.
We have compared the management of SBO in patients with clinical stable condition in two successive periods : from 1989 to 1998, 127 patients (preSCT group) for whom management was based on standard clinical-biological-radiological assessment (CBRA) et from 1999 to 2000, 30 patients (SCT group) for whom management included SCT. The decision of surgical team was correlated with the type of small bowel obstruction at laparotomy : closed-loop obstruction without intestinal necrosis (true-positive), intestinal necrosis as a consequence of delayed diagnosis defined as false-negative, diffuse adhesion defined as false-positive et patient non operated defined as true-negative.
Among the 127 patients from the preSCT group, 87 were treated conservatively and 40 were operated : SBO with closed-loop obstruction without intestinal necrosis (n = 29,72%), SBO with diffuse adhesion (n = 4, 10%) and SBO with intestinal necrosis (n = 7, 17%). Among the 30 patients from the SCT group, 16 were treated conservatively and 14 were operated: SBO with closed-loop obstruction without intestinal necrosis (n = 8, 57%), SBO with diffuse adhesion (n = 6,43%) and SBO with intestinal necrosis (n = 0,0%; NS). Both groups were similar for rates of patients with SBO with or without necrosis and rate of patients treated conservatively (NS). In SCT group, there was significantly more patients operated for diffuse adhesions (p < 0,01). Negative predictive value of CBRA + TDM was significantly higher than those of CBRA alone (p = 0,041).
Due to a very high sensibility, TDM increase probably the rate of early laparotomies, maybe unnecessary, in patients without any sign of SBO due to closed-loop obstruction. Thus, systematic use of TDM in patients with clinical suspicion of SBO remains to be evaluated.
本研究的目的是前瞻性评估对拟进行初始保守治疗的术后小肠梗阻(SBO)患者常规使用腹部螺旋计算机断层扫描(SCT)的影响。
我们比较了两个连续时期临床状况稳定的SBO患者的治疗情况:1989年至1998年,127例患者(SCT前组),其治疗基于标准的临床-生物学-放射学评估(CBRA);1999年至2000年,30例患者(SCT组),其治疗包括SCT。手术团队的决策与剖腹手术时小肠梗阻的类型相关:无肠坏死的闭袢性梗阻(真阳性)、因诊断延迟导致的肠坏死定义为假阴性、弥漫性粘连定义为假阳性以及未进行手术的患者定义为真阴性。
SCT前组的127例患者中,87例接受了保守治疗,40例接受了手术:无肠坏死的闭袢性SBO(n = 29,72%)、弥漫性粘连性SBO(n = 4,10%)和肠坏死性SBO(n = 7,17%)。SCT组的30例患者中,16例接受了保守治疗,14例接受了手术:无肠坏死的闭袢性SBO(n = 8,57%)、弥漫性粘连性SBO(n = 6,43%)和肠坏死性SBO(n = 0,0%;无显著性差异)。两组在有无坏死的SBO患者发生率以及接受保守治疗的患者发生率方面相似(无显著性差异)。在SCT组中,因弥漫性粘连而接受手术的患者明显更多(p < 0.01)。CBRA + TDM的阴性预测值显著高于单独的CBRA(p = 0.041)。
由于敏感性非常高,TDM可能会增加对无闭袢性梗阻导致SBO任何迹象患者进行早期剖腹手术的比率,这可能是不必要的。因此,对于临床怀疑SBO的患者系统性使用TDM仍有待评估。