Rutherford Alexandra
History and Theory of Physiology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Hist Behav Sci. 2003 Winter;39(1):1-23. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.10090.
From the 1940s through the 1970s, articles in popular magazines and newspapers presented B. F. Skinner in a wide array of guises, from educational revolutionary and utopian to totalitarian and fascist. Understanding these diverse, and often contradictory, portrayals requires a consideration of the social and political discourses in which they were embedded. In this paper, I suggest that reports of Skinner's work were influenced by a number of cultural categories, from the better living campaign of the 1950s, to the counterculture crusade of the late 1960s. Through this examination, a multifaceted rendering of Skinner's public image that takes into account the nature of his work, the context in which it was produced, and the culture in which it was received is revealed. I propose that the received view of Skinner as maligned behaviorist actually obscures the complexity of his relationship with psychology's public throughout this period.
从20世纪40年代到70年代,大众杂志和报纸上的文章以各种各样的形象呈现了B. F. 斯金纳,从教育革命者、乌托邦主义者到极权主义者和法西斯主义者。要理解这些多样且常常相互矛盾的描绘,需要考虑它们所嵌入的社会和政治话语。在本文中,我认为关于斯金纳工作的报道受到了许多文化范畴的影响,从20世纪50年代的美好生活运动到20世纪60年代末的反文化运动。通过这次审视,展现出了一个多面的斯金纳公众形象,它考虑到了他工作的性质、其产生的背景以及接受它的文化。我提出,人们普遍认为斯金纳是被诋毁的行为主义者,这实际上掩盖了在此期间他与心理学界公众关系的复杂性。