Cai Q, Tao Z, Yang Q
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060.
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2001 Apr;15(4):167-8, 170.
To investigate if there is difference about the parameters of acoustic analysis with the different vowel |a|, |i|, |ae| and decide which vowels is best fitted to the acoustic analysis.
40 normal and 130 pathologic voice patients accepted acoustic analysis. Each acoustic parameters such as jitter, shimmer, NNE, SDF0, SNR were compared with different vowels.
Jitter, shimmer, NNE with |i| were much lower than that with |a| and |ae| in normal cases and light hoarseness group. While the acoustic parameters with |i| were much higher than that with |a| and |ae| in moderate and heavy hoarseness group.
|a| and |ae| were the preferred vowels for normal and light hoarseness group, while the |i| could supply some useful suggestion for the moderate and heavy hoarse patients.
研究不同元音|a|、|i|、|ae|的声学分析参数是否存在差异,并确定哪种元音最适合声学分析。
40名正常嗓音者和130名嗓音病理患者接受声学分析。将每个声学参数,如抖动、闪烁、归一化噪声能量、基频标准差、信噪比,与不同元音进行比较。
在正常情况和轻度声嘶组中,|i|的抖动、闪烁、归一化噪声能量远低于|a|和|ae|。而在中度和重度声嘶组中,|i|的声学参数远高于|a|和|ae|。
|a|和|ae|是正常和轻度声嘶组的首选元音,而|i|可为中度和重度声嘶患者提供一些有用的建议。