Voit Eberhard O
Department of Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, PO Box 250551, 135 Cannon Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Math Biosci. 2003 Mar;182(1):81-92. doi: 10.1016/s0025-5564(02)00162-1.
Metabolic engineering has as a goal the improvement of yield of desired products from microorganisms and cell lines. This goal has traditionally been approached with experimental biotechnological methods, but it is becoming increasingly popular to precede the experimental phase by a mathematical modeling step that allows objective pre-screening of possible improvement strategies. The models are either linear and represent the stoichiometry and flux distribution in pathways or they are non-linear and account for the full kinetic behavior of the pathway, which is often significantly effected by regulatory signals. Linear flux analysis is simpler and requires less input information than a full kinetic analysis, and the question arises whether the consideration of non-linearities is really necessary for devising optimal strategies for yield improvements. The article analyzes this question with a generic, representative pathway. It shows that flux split ratios, which are the key criterion for linear flux analysis, are essentially sufficient for unregulated, but not for regulated branch points. The interrelationships between regulatory design on one hand and optimal patterns of operation on the other suggest the investigation of operating principles that complement design principles, like a user's manual complements the hardwiring of electronic equipment.
代谢工程的目标是提高微生物和细胞系中所需产物的产量。传统上,这一目标是通过实验生物技术方法来实现的,但在实验阶段之前先进行数学建模步骤变得越来越普遍,该步骤允许对可能的改进策略进行客观的预筛选。这些模型要么是线性的,代表途径中的化学计量和通量分布,要么是非线性的,考虑途径的完整动力学行为,而这通常会受到调节信号的显著影响。线性通量分析比完整的动力学分析更简单,所需的输入信息更少,于是就出现了一个问题,即对于设计产量提高的最优策略而言,考虑非线性是否真的必要。本文用一个通用的代表性途径分析了这个问题。结果表明,通量分配比作为线性通量分析的关键标准,对于无调节的分支点基本足够,但对于有调节的分支点则不够。一方面,调节设计与另一方面的最优操作模式之间的相互关系表明,需要研究补充设计原则的操作原则,就像用户手册补充电子设备的硬件线路一样。