• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

含乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和亚硫酸盐的丙泊酚制剂对吸烟者气管插管后呼吸系统阻力的影响。

Effects of EDTA- and sulfite-containing formulations of propofol on respiratory system resistance after tracheal intubation in smokers.

作者信息

Rieschke Petra, LaFleur Bonnie J, Janicki Piotr K

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Biostatistics, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):323-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00009.

DOI:10.1097/00000542-200302000-00009
PMID:12552188
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The formulation of sulfite-containing propofol (SCP) has not been thoroughly investigated in patients with the extensive smoking history for the effects on the total respiratory system resistance after tracheal intubation. However adverse effects, including acute asthma and bronchospasm, have been reported with several other parenteral formulations of drugs containing sulfite as preservative. Therefore, the aim of this prospective randomized and double blind study was to investigate the effects of EDTA-containing propofol (ECP) and SCP on total respiratory system resistance (Rrs) in patients with the prolonged smoking history and undergoing propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia with tracheal intubation.

METHODS

40 patients scheduled for general anesthesia were enrolled into the study. Anesthesia was induced with either 2 mg/kg ECP, or 2 mg/kg SCP followed by vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg) to ensure complete neuromuscular relaxation for the time of the study. Maintenance anesthesia was continued with propofol infusion at 0.15 mg/kg/min for the first 15 min after intubation. Total respiratory system resistance (Rrs), was measured continuously for 10 min postintubation.

RESULTS

The analysis of repeated Rrs measurements taken every minute for 10 min postintubation revealed trend consisting of higher Rrs in the SCP group when compared to the ECP group. The statistical analysis of the data performed using repeated measures analysis of covariance demonstrated statistically significant effect (P < 0.05) of the treatment group factor (SCP vs. ECP) and the time factor (time after intubation) on the postintubation Rrs.

CONCLUSION

The total respiratory system resistance measured repeatedly for 10 min after tracheal intubation in patients with smoking history is significantly elevated after induction with SCP than after induction with ECP. The preservative used for propofol formulation may alter the effects of propofol on the total respiratory system resistance in smokers.

摘要

背景

对于有广泛吸烟史的患者,含亚硫酸盐丙泊酚(SCP)制剂在气管插管后对总呼吸系统阻力的影响尚未进行全面研究。然而,已有报道称,其他几种含有亚硫酸盐作为防腐剂的胃肠外给药制剂会产生包括急性哮喘和支气管痉挛在内的不良反应。因此,这项前瞻性随机双盲研究的目的是调查含乙二胺四乙酸丙泊酚(ECP)和SCP对有长期吸烟史且接受基于丙泊酚的全凭静脉麻醉并气管插管患者的总呼吸系统阻力(Rrs)的影响。

方法

40例计划接受全身麻醉的患者纳入本研究。使用2mg/kg ECP或2mg/kg SCP诱导麻醉,随后给予维库溴铵(0.1mg/kg),以确保在研究期间完全神经肌肉松弛。插管后最初15分钟内,以0.15mg/kg/分钟的速度持续输注丙泊酚维持麻醉。插管后连续10分钟测量总呼吸系统阻力(Rrs)。

结果

对插管后10分钟内每分钟重复测量的Rrs进行分析发现,与ECP组相比,SCP组的Rrs有升高趋势。使用重复测量协方差分析对数据进行的统计分析表明,治疗组因素(SCP与ECP)和时间因素(插管后时间)对插管后Rrs有统计学显著影响(P<0.05)。

结论

有吸烟史的患者在气管插管后10分钟内重复测量的总呼吸系统阻力,在使用SCP诱导后比使用ECP诱导后显著升高。用于丙泊酚制剂的防腐剂可能会改变丙泊酚对吸烟者总呼吸系统阻力的影响。

相似文献

1
Effects of EDTA- and sulfite-containing formulations of propofol on respiratory system resistance after tracheal intubation in smokers.含乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和亚硫酸盐的丙泊酚制剂对吸烟者气管插管后呼吸系统阻力的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):323-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00009.
2
Comparative effects of thiopentone and propofol on respiratory resistance after tracheal intubation.硫喷妥钠和丙泊酚对气管插管后呼吸阻力的比较效应。
Br J Anaesth. 1996 Dec;77(6):735-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/77.6.735.
3
The effects of thiopental and generic and nongeneric propofol on respiratory resistance during anesthetic induction in patients with reactive airways.硫喷妥钠以及普通和非普通丙泊酚对气道反应性患者麻醉诱导期间呼吸阻力的影响。
J Clin Anesth. 2002 Jun;14(4):257-61. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00357-4.
4
Comparative effects of propofol, landiolol, and nicardipine on hemodynamic and bispectral index responses to endotracheal intubation: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.丙泊酚、兰地洛尔和尼卡地平对气管插管血流动力学及脑电双频指数反应的比较效应:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2008 Jun;20(4):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.11.006.
5
Spectral analysis of arterial pressure variability during induction of propofol anesthesia.丙泊酚麻醉诱导期间动脉压变异性的频谱分析
Anesth Analg. 1996 May;82(5):914-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199605000-00004.
6
Comparison of the effects of etomidate, propofol, and thiopental on respiratory resistance after tracheal intubation.依托咪酯、丙泊酚和硫喷妥钠对气管插管后呼吸阻力影响的比较。
Anesthesiology. 1996 Jun;84(6):1307-11. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199606000-00005.
7
Salbutamol prevents the increase of respiratory resistance caused by tracheal intubation during sevoflurane anesthesia in asthmatic children.沙丁胺醇可预防哮喘患儿在七氟醚麻醉期间气管插管引起的呼吸阻力增加。
Anesth Analg. 2001 Oct;93(4):898-902. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200110000-00019.
8
The clinical and biochemical effects of propofol infusion with and without EDTA for maintenance anesthesia in healthy children undergoing ambulatory surgery.
Anesth Analg. 2001 Jul;93(1):106-11. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200107000-00023.
9
Comparison of effects of thoracic epidural and intravenous administration of lidocaine on target-controlled infusion of propofol and tracheal intubation response during induction of anesthesia.比较胸段硬膜外和静脉给予利多卡因对麻醉诱导期间丙泊酚靶控输注和气管插管反应的影响。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Dec;27(6):1295-300. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 May 22.
10
Comparison of the time to extubation after use of remifentanil or sufentanil in combination with propofol as anesthesia in adults undergoing nonemergency intracranial surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.瑞芬太尼或舒芬太尼联合丙泊酚用于非急诊颅内手术成年患者麻醉后拔管时间的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。
Clin Ther. 2006 Apr;28(4):560-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.04.001.