Suppr超能文献

抗纤溶疗法与接受大型骨科手术的癌症患者围手术期失血情况

Antifibrinolytic therapy and perioperative blood loss in cancer patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery.

作者信息

Amar David, Grant Florence M, Zhang Hao, Boland Patrick J, Leung Denis H, Healey John A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York 10021, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):337-42. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00011.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aprotinin has been reported to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients having major orthopedic operations. Data on whether epsilon amino-caproic acid (EACA) is effective in this population are sparse.

METHODS

Sixty-nine adults with malignancy scheduled for either pelvic, extremity or spine surgery during general anesthesia entered this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, and received either intravenous aprotinin (n = 23), bolus of 2 x 10(6) kallikrein inactivator units (KIU), followed by an infusion of 5 x 10(5) KIU/h, or EACA (n = 22), bolus of 150 mg/kg, followed by a 15 mg/kg/h infusion or saline placebo (n = 24) during surgery. Our goal was to determine whether prophylactic EACA or aprotinin therapy would reduce perioperative blood loss (intraoperative + first 48h) >30% when compared to placebo.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 52 +/- 17 yr. The groups did not differ in age, duration of surgery, perioperative blood loss or number of packed erythrocyte units transfused. When compared to the placebo group, the two treated groups had a significantly lower D-Dimer level immediately after surgery, P < 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the conditions of this study, we were unable to find a clinical benefit to using aprotinin or EACA to reduce perioperative blood loss or transfusion requirements during major orthopedic surgery in cancer patients.

摘要

背景

据报道,抑肽酶可减少接受大型骨科手术患者的失血量和输血量。关于ε-氨基己酸(EACA)在该人群中是否有效的数据较少。

方法

69例计划在全身麻醉下进行骨盆、四肢或脊柱手术的成年恶性肿瘤患者进入了这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,在手术期间,他们分别接受静脉注射抑肽酶(n = 23),即先推注2×10⁶激肽释放酶灭活单位(KIU),然后以5×10⁵ KIU/h的速度输注;或EACA(n = 22),先推注150 mg/kg,然后以15 mg/kg/h的速度输注;或生理盐水安慰剂(n = 24)。我们的目标是确定与安慰剂相比,预防性使用EACA或抑肽酶治疗是否能使围手术期失血量(术中+术后48小时)减少>30%。

结果

研究人群的平均年龄为52±17岁。各组在年龄、手术时间、围手术期失血量或输注的红细胞悬液单位数量方面没有差异。与安慰剂组相比,两个治疗组在术后立即的D-二聚体水平显著较低,P < 0.01。

结论

在本研究条件下,我们未能发现使用抑肽酶或EACA在癌症患者的大型骨科手术中减少围手术期失血量或输血量有临床益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验