Luczak Holger, Reuth Ralph, Schmidt Ludger
Institute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, Aachen University of Technology, Bergdriesch 27, D52062 Aachen, Germany.
Ergonomics. 2003 Jan 15;46(1-3):19-40. doi: 10.1080/00140130303519.
This contribution deals with the impact of human error on the overall system reliability in flexible manufacturing systems (FMS). Autonomous production cells are used to illustrate an error-compensating system design on the basis of Sheridan's (1997) paradigm of supervisory control. In order to specify human errors and their effects in terms of system disturbances, a taxonomy of system disturbances is recommended. This taxonomic approach was derived by a value benefit analysis and is based on HEDOMS (Human Error and Disturbance Occurrence in Manufacturing Systems) with slight modifications and Reason's GEMS (Generic Error Modelling System). The taxonomy is used for data acquisition. Next, a risk priority equivalent to FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) is introduced to structure the data according to their relevance. Then, Vicente's and Rasmussen's guidelines (1987) for an ecological interface design are related to the paradigm of supervisory control. On the basis of these guidelines four case studies are presented to show their successful applicability for interface design in FMS.
本文探讨了人为错误对柔性制造系统(FMS)整体系统可靠性的影响。基于谢里丹(1997年)的监控范式,采用自主生产单元来说明一种错误补偿系统设计。为了根据系统干扰来明确人为错误及其影响,推荐了一种系统干扰分类法。这种分类方法是通过价值效益分析得出的,基于制造系统中的人为错误与干扰发生(HEDOMS)并略有修改,以及瑞森的通用错误建模系统(GEMS)。该分类法用于数据采集。接下来,引入了一个与失效模式与影响分析(FMEA)等效的风险优先级,以便根据数据的相关性对其进行组织。然后,将维森特和拉斯穆森(1987年)的生态界面设计指南与监控范式联系起来。基于这些指南,给出了四个案例研究,以展示它们在FMS界面设计中的成功适用性。