Suppr超能文献

[生物陶瓷在胸腰椎骨折治疗中的应用]

[Use of bioceramics in the treatment of fractures of the thoraco-lumbar spine].

作者信息

Stulík J, Krbec M, Vyskocil T

机构信息

I. ortopedická klinika 1. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha.

出版信息

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2002;69(5):288-94.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The primary reduction and stabilization of all types of injury to the thoracolumbar spine is currently performed from the posterior approach by an internal, transpedicular fixator. The exceptions are type A fractures, according to the AO classification, that can primarily be treated from the anterior approach. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of BAS-O bioceramic granules, inserted by transpedicular approach, on the development of post-operative kyphosis of the segments injured.

MATERIAL

Between 1997 and 2001 we treated anterior spinal column fractures, using bioceramic granules in combination with an internal fixator, in 53 patients (40 men, 13 women: age 26 to 69 years; average, 42.3 years) at the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the Third Faculty of Medicine and FNKV in Prague. However, only 42 patients (33 men, 9 women; age 28 to 67 years; average, 41.6 years) who had had the metal fixator removed more than six months previously were included in the study. The fixator was removed in the range of 10 to 24 months after the primary operation. The sample was divided into two groups; one with bioceramic material inserted in the body of the damaged vertebra (20 patients) and the other bioceramic granules implanted in both the vertebral body and the intervertebral space (22 patients).

METHODS

In all the patients, the standard procedure included transpedicular application of Schanz's screws and an USS FS fixator (Synthes). If necessary, distraction of the segment injured and the correction of lordosis were carried out. Further transpedicular procedures to treat the anterior spinal column were as follows: If the vertebral body was injured without destruction to the intervertebral disc, a bent elevator was inserted through the vertebral foramen and the intervertebral joints were reduced. At the same time, a cavity for application of bioceramic granules was created. These were inserted, using a funnel and a pusher, in the anterior part of the injured body. If the fracture involved a destroyed intervertebral disc, the disc was removed, the vertebral end plate of the adjacent vertebra was perforated and bioceramic granules were inserted in both the vertebral body and intervertebral space. Subsequently, spongeous bone grafts were harvested from the ilium and massively applied to the previously decorticated transverse and articular processes.

RESULTS

In the group of patients who had bioceramic granules inserted in only the vertebral body, the kyphotic angle was on average 10.36 degrees after injury and 2.86 degrees after surgery; therefore, a correction by 13.22 degrees was achieved. At 3 and 6 months after surgery, the kyphotic angle was 2.71 degrees and 2.68 degrees, respectively; at 3 and 6 months after fixator removal, it was 0.67 degree in both instances. In the group of patients with bioceramic granules implanted in both the vertebral body and intervertebral space, the kyphotic angle was on average 9.16 degrees after injury and 4.26 degrees after, surgery; therefore, a correction by 13.43 degrees was achieved. At 3 and 6 months after surgery, the kyphotic angle was -4.11 degrees and -4.00 degrees, respectively; at 3 and 6 months after fixator removal, it was 2.38 degrees and 2.44 degrees, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Our results revealed differences between the patients who had bioceramic granules inserted in only the vertebral body and those who had them also in the intervertebral space. At 6 months after surgery, the first group showed the loss of correction per two segments to be 3.53 degrees on the average, whereas the second group had a loss of 6.70 degrees, i.e., twice as high. This may be explained by a more serious damage to the intervertebral disc in the latter group. Only small differences between the groups were found in the kyphotic angle at both 6 months after surgery and 3 to 6 months after fixator removal. This implied that, in both groups, the loss of correction occurred in the period up to 3 months after removal of the fixator.

CONCLUSIONS

Bioceramic granules provide material for replacement of osseous tissue in the body of the vertebra as well as conditions necessary for bone restructuring. The loss of correction per segment is lower by about half in patients treated with bioceramic granules than in those who received a spongeous bone grafts.

摘要

研究目的

目前,胸腰椎各类损伤的初次复位及固定主要通过后路经椎弓根内固定器来完成。根据AO分类,A型骨折为例外,其可首选前路治疗。本研究旨在评估经椎弓根途径植入BAS - O生物陶瓷颗粒对损伤节段术后后凸畸形发展的影响。

材料

1997年至2001年间,我们在布拉格第三医学院和FNKV的骨科与创伤科,对53例(40例男性,13例女性;年龄26至69岁,平均42.3岁)前路脊柱骨折患者使用生物陶瓷颗粒联合内固定器进行治疗。然而,本研究仅纳入了42例(33例男性,9例女性;年龄28至67岁,平均41.6岁)患者,这些患者在初次手术后超过6个月已取出金属固定器。固定器在初次手术后10至24个月内取出。样本分为两组;一组在受损椎体中植入生物陶瓷材料(20例患者),另一组在椎体和椎间隙均植入生物陶瓷颗粒(22例患者)。

方法

所有患者的标准手术步骤包括经椎弓根置入Schanz螺钉及USS FS固定器(Synthes)。如有必要,对损伤节段进行撑开并矫正前凸。进一步经椎弓根治疗前路脊柱的步骤如下:若椎体损伤但椎间盘未破坏,通过椎孔插入弯形骨膜剥离器并复位椎间关节。同时,制备用于植入生物陶瓷颗粒的腔隙。使用漏斗和推送器将颗粒植入受损椎体前部。若骨折累及已破坏的椎间盘,则切除椎间盘,对相邻椎体的终板进行穿孔,并在椎体和椎间隙均植入生物陶瓷颗粒。随后,从髂骨获取松质骨并大量植于先前已去皮质的横突和关节突上。

结果

仅在椎体植入生物陶瓷颗粒的患者组,受伤后平均后凸角为10.36°,术后为2.86°;因此,矫正了13.22°。术后3个月和6个月时,后凸角分别为2.71°和2.68°;固定器取出后3个月和6个月时,均为0.67°。在椎体和椎间隙均植入生物陶瓷颗粒的患者组,受伤后平均后凸角为9.16°,术后为4.26°;因此,矫正了13.43°。术后3个月和6个月时,后凸角分别为 - 4.11°和 - 4.00°;固定器取出后3个月和6个月时,分别为2.38°和2.44°。

讨论

我们的结果显示,仅在椎体植入生物陶瓷颗粒的患者与在椎体和椎间隙均植入的患者之间存在差异。术后6个月时,第一组平均每两个节段的矫正丢失为3.53°,而第二组为6.70°,即高出两倍。这可能是由于后一组椎间盘损伤更严重。在术后6个月以及固定器取出后3至6个月时,两组在后凸角方面仅发现微小差异。这表明,两组在固定器取出后3个月内均出现了矫正丢失。

结论

生物陶瓷颗粒为椎体骨质组织的替代提供了材料,也为骨重建创造了必要条件。与接受松质骨移植的患者相比,使用生物陶瓷颗粒治疗的患者每节段的矫正丢失降低了约一半。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验