Grene M
Department of Philosophy, Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA 24061-0126, USA.
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2001;23(2):187-211.
In writing, in the Origin of Species, of 'two great laws' on which organic beings are formed, 'Unity of Type' and 'Conditions of Existence', Darwin was referring to the famous opposition between Cuvier and Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, first stated publicly in the spring of 1830. After a brief statement of the chief points at issue in the debate, I raise the question of Darwin's attitude to the disagreement and the views of the two protagonists. There are numerous earlier, and some later, references to Cuvier and Geoffroy in the Darwin archives, notebooks, marginalia and correspondence. An examination of these materials suggests a shift in Darwin's sympathies, from Geoffroy to Cuvier. However, some of Geoffroy's principles are retained, and, in adopting Cuvier's phrase 'conditions of existence', Darwin partly alters its meaning. Finally, since originally, and in its adoption by such writers as Whewell and Owen, the expression 'conditions of existence' was interpreted as entailing design or final cause, I consider the vexed question of Darwin's attitude to teleology.
在《物种起源》中论述生物形成所依据的“两大法则”——“类型的统一”和“生存条件”时,达尔文提及了居维叶和若弗鲁瓦·圣伊莱尔之间著名的对立观点,这一观点于1830年春首次公开提出。在简要阐述了这场辩论的主要争议点之后,我提出了达尔文对这场分歧的态度以及两位主要人物观点的问题。在达尔文的档案、笔记本、旁注和信件中,有许多早期以及一些后期提及居维叶和若弗鲁瓦的内容。对这些材料的研究表明,达尔文的同情有所转变,从若弗鲁瓦转向了居维叶。然而,若弗鲁瓦的一些原则得以保留,并且在采用居维叶的“生存条件”这一表述时,达尔文部分地改变了其含义。最后,由于最初以及像惠威尔和欧文等作家采用“生存条件”这一表述时,它被解释为蕴含着设计或终极因,所以我思考了达尔文对目的论态度这一棘手问题。