Suppr超能文献

镫骨切除术:明胶海绵与组织移植物的比较

Stapedectomy: gelfoam compared with tissue grafts.

作者信息

Sheehy J L, Perkins J H

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 1976 Mar;86(3):436-44. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197603000-00013.

Abstract

The commonest causes of failure with the prefabricated wire loop-gel foam pad technique are inferior displacement of the loop in the window, high membrane formation and window fibrosis. As a result of these problems some members of the Otologic Medical Group have abandoned the use of gelfoam in favor of tissue grafts. A comparison of the results with gelfoam, fat grafts, and fascia grafts in 573 primary cases is made. Tissue grafts yielded a lower incidence of postoperative vertigo, of temporary and permanent sensori-neural hearing impairment, of fistulas and of long-term hearing regression. The conclusion is that a tissue graft is preferable to gelfoam as an oval window covering in stapedectomy.

摘要

预制钢丝环-明胶海绵垫技术失败的最常见原因是环在窗口内移位、形成厚膜和窗口纤维化。由于这些问题,耳科医学小组的一些成员已不再使用明胶海绵,转而采用组织移植。本文对573例原发性病例中使用明胶海绵、脂肪移植和筋膜移植的结果进行了比较。组织移植术后眩晕、暂时性和永久性感音神经性听力损害、瘘管形成及长期听力减退的发生率较低。结论是,在镫骨切除术中,作为卵圆窗覆盖物,组织移植优于明胶海绵。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验